> Were you using Components containing single files as generated by heat.exe?
Many of the components only contain a single file but others have multiple
files per component (mostly for ASP.NET projects that contain a lot of
files). Note that I only have to support major upgrades so having multiple
On 3/22/2010 8:36 AM, jhennessey wrote:
> In the end I just wanted to put this out there to raise awareness of the
> issue and also to see if I should put in a feature request or something.
>
Yes, please. Though we'll need a lot more detail: MSI installs files in
order of their sequence, not
2010 14:02
Aan: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Onderwerp: Re: [WiX-users] Performance Issues with File table sequencing
Were you using Components containing single files as generated by
heat.exe? Can you explain how you modified your File Id's to streamline
the sequenci
-
From: jhennessey [mailto:jack.hennes...@onbase.com]
Sent: 22 March 2010 12:36
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [WiX-users] Performance Issues with File table sequencing
After days of researching why the current installer that I am porting
from InstallShield (it's a pure
After days of researching why the current installer that I am porting from
InstallShield (it's a pure MSI not InstallScript) to WiX installs so much
slower I think I have found an answer. It looks like WiX sequences files in
the file table by their file id. In comparison it appears that InstallShi
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Simon Topley
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006
8:26 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
Simon Topley; wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users]
Performance issues
Preaching to the choir there, we were
using an old shonky none m
they are complaining about
nothing.
Cheers Rob.
From: Rob Mensching
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 August 2006
16:17To: 'Simon Topley';
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.netSubject: RE: [WiX-users] Performance
issues
When
you say you've replaced InstallShield with the WiX t
'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Performance issues
InstallShield versions were compressed yes, I ran some tests and
here are the results (as accurate as I can get them):
Installsheild
Versions:
Product
Size
.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon
Topley
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:12 AM
To: 'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: [WiX-users] Performance issues
Good morning to the Brotherhood/Sisterhood,
I'm sure this is a prob
e
install time. Windows installers are certainly slower, but not by much, it's
worth the trade off for ease of delivery, not to mention
maintenance.
Simon
From: Bob Arnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2006 15:34To: Simon TopleyCc:
'wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Title: Message
FWIW I noticed when testing an MSI on our XP Embedded
units that MSIs w/ compression installed noticibly slower than the same
component set w/o compression. We install ~200+ files in various binary
and text formats.
_Bob Rafuse
-Original Message-From:
Title: Performance issues
Simon Topley wrote:
I'm sure this is a problem others have encounted. I
have now replace our suite of installsheild products with spanky new
WIX versions. I have managed to elimitnate a large amount of redundant
code (previous installers copied large amount
Title: Performance issues
Good morning to the Brotherhood/Sisterhood,
I'm sure this is a problem others have encounted. I have now replace our suite of installsheild products with spanky new WIX versions. I have managed to elimitnate a large amount of redundant code (previous installers copi
13 matches
Mail list logo
