Re: [WiX-users] per-user/per-machine in MSM, MSI and bundle

2013-07-02 Thread Parkes, Kevin
"The installer has insufficient privileges to access this directory" Thanks anyway Kevin -- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:04:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Phill Hogland Subject: Re: [WiX-users] per-user/per-machine in MSM, MSI and bundle To: wix-users@lists.sourc

Re: [WiX-users] per-user/per-machine in MSM, MSI and bundle

2013-07-01 Thread Phill Hogland
I have been following this thread, and while I am pretty new I decided to play with this problem as a learning experience. I created the following modules, which are slightly different from your code, which compile and do not generate any warnings or errors. I think the main change I made was to

Re: [WiX-users] per-user/per-machine in MSM, MSI and bundle

2013-07-01 Thread Parkes, Kevin
h="no" on and add a with KeyPath=yes" and Root="HKCU" (If I don't add - or if I use "HKMU" - the ICE75 becomes an error rather than a warning) The component contains an , my added , the (with child) and a Subject: Re: [WiX-users] per-user/per-mac

Re: [WiX-users] per-user/per-machine in MSM, MSI and bundle

2013-06-27 Thread Parkes, Kevin
arately. 2. Add MsiPackage\@ForcePerMachine and set it to "yes" in your per-machine bundle. Blair > From: kevin.par...@wacom.eu > To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:29:39 + > Subject: [WiX-users] per-user/per-machine in MSM, MSI and bundle

Re: [WiX-users] per-user/per-machine in MSM, MSI and bundle

2013-06-27 Thread Blair Murri
you will have ICE errors/warnings unless you build per-machine and per-user MSIs separately. 2. Add MsiPackage\@ForcePerMachine and set it to "yes" in your per-machine bundle. Blair > From: kevin.par...@wacom.eu > To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Date: Thu, 27 Jun 20

[WiX-users] per-user/per-machine in MSM, MSI and bundle

2013-06-27 Thread Parkes, Kevin
Question 1. I am creating an MSM for a COM DLL. I am using the MSM in my own per-user MSI and I am getting ICE warnings 57 ("per-user and per-machine data with an HKCU Registry KeyPath") and 91 ("file will be installed to the per user directory that doesn't vary based on ALLUSERS "). How do I fi

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-06 Thread Markus Karg
> -Original Message- > From: Wilson, Phil [mailto:phil.wil...@wonderware.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 5. November 2009 23:33 > To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine > > InstallPrivileges is to do wit

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-05 Thread Wilson, Phil
trator supplies credentials on behalf of the non-admin user. Phil Wilson -Original Message- From: Markus Karg [mailto:markus.k...@gmx.net] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:04 PM To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.' Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Per Use

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-05 Thread Markus Karg
phil.wil...@wonderware.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 5. November 2009 21:44 > To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset. > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine > > A couple of comments: > > 1. It's only since UAC that the per-machine/per-user diffi

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-05 Thread Wilson, Phil
installed but there's no shortcut"). Phil Wilson -Original Message- From: Markus Karg [mailto:markus.k...@gmx.net] Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 11:53 AM To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.' Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-05 Thread Markus Karg
ocation that > requires elevation to access, that is, a per-machine location, so you > can't > really use it in a per-user package.) > > -Original Message- > From: Markus Karg [mailto:markus.k...@gmx.net] > Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:53 AM > To: 'Gene

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-04 Thread Markus Karg
Thanks Markus > -Original Message- > From: Blair [mailto:os...@live.com] > Sent: Mittwoch, 4. November 2009 06:47 > To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.' > Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine > > Sorry if I am confusing yo

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-04 Thread Andreas Mertens
Message- From: Blair [mailto:os...@live.com] Sent: November-03-09 9:47 PM To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.' Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine Sorry if I am confusing you. I recommend you decide upfront if your installation will be per-user or p

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-04 Thread Andreas Mertens
mber-03-09 9:47 PM To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.' Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine Sorry if I am confusing you. I recommend you decide upfront if your installation will be per-user or per-machine. Don't try to make a package that is

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-03 Thread Blair
AM To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.' Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine Blair, now I am more confused than before. On one hand you say, I shall write a .msi that is either perUser OR perMachine, on the other hand you say that it is very hard to do when not u

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-03 Thread Markus Karg
it is impossible to write a correctly working setup on any OS before W7.";-( Regards Markus > -Original Message- > From: Blair [mailto:os...@live.com] > Sent: Montag, 2. November 2009 21:43 > To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.' > Subject: Re:

Re: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-02 Thread Blair
n't found the magic incantation yet. -Original Message- From: Markus Karg [mailto:markus.k...@gmx.net] Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 11:01 AM To: 'General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.' Subject: [WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine Blair, in a diffe

[WiX-users] Per User / Per Machine

2009-11-02 Thread Markus Karg
Blair, in a different context you wrote: > It is best to make your installations pure-perMachine or pure- > perUser > and never mix them There is one thing I do not understand in that context: I always had the impression that it is up to the *administrator* to decide whether to install a softwar