ge-
> From: PKEuS [mailto:philipp.kl...@web.de]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 3:57 PM
> To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Major upgrade stops working after doing small
> changes and switching to 3.6
>
> I finally found the solution (by trial&a
rade stops working after doing small changes
and switching to 3.6
I finally found the solution (by trial&error):
Its the VC CRT merge module I added. It requires per-machine install and thus
whole install scope changes.
Any ideas how to solve that (if possible with keeping installer per-user)?
I finally found the solution (by trial&error):
Its the VC CRT merge module I added. It requires per-machine install and
thus whole install scope changes.
Any ideas how to solve that (if possible with keeping installer per-user)?
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix
> Your previous install was per user, the new install is per machine, and one
will not upgrade the other. The Windows default if unspecified is per user,
so perhaps if you never set it in the original install it defaulted to per
user.
The question is: Why has the new one a different setting? I d
- it
may show why you got a per user install if you weren't expecting one.
Phil W
-Original Message-
From: PKEuS [mailto:philipp.kl...@web.de]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2012 2:50 AM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Major upgrade stops working after
Has nobody an idea what (and why) is going wrong?
As far as I can see, it doesn't find the old installation because of
conflicting InstallScope. But I have no idea, why install scope is different
(even if I explicitly set it).
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-t
You can find verbose log file here:
http://kloke-witten.dyndns.org/~philipp/Temp/msi_log.zip
There are some lines about finding related products, where it says
"FindRelatedProducts: current install is per-machine. Related install for
product '{1CC8C271-A877-4DF0-B1DE-C1B7D83521BC}' is per-user.
If theUpgradeCode is stable then I don't see anything obvious. What does
verbose logfile for update show?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:05 AM, PKEuS wrote:
> Hello,
>
> First of all, sorry for posting this a second time, but my first post (via
> nabble) seems to have been rejected, because I hadn't
Hello,
I am a dev of the cppcheck project and I am trying to improve our installer.
We are using WiX, and the original installer was built using WiX 3.5. You
can see the original installer code here:
https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/tree/master/win_installer
I switched to WiX 3.6(.3303), made t
Hello,
First of all, sorry for posting this a second time, but my first post (via
nabble) seems to have been rejected, because I hadn't received subscription
confirmation mail before.
I am a dev of the cppcheck project and I am trying to improve our installer.
We are using WiX, and the original i
10 matches
Mail list logo
