#x27;t find it in the archives..)
Phil Wilson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff
Finger
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 3:24 PM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Installing shared assemblies
On Fri, 27 Oct
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Phil Wilson wrote:
> If you have a .NET assembly exposing COM interfaces you don't need an
> interop Dll, but you need it registering in the same general way that
> Regasm does (there's Tallow). Gacutil just puts it in the GAC. What you
> get for a registered .NET assembly are
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users]
Installing shared assemblies
I'm pretty sure you get a
bunch of ICE 33 warnings with the typelib registry entries over the TypeLib
table. I can vouch that the Registry Table route works. It is, I believe, the
generally (arguably?) preferred w
Wilson, Phil wrote:
> I'm not sure whether Wix prefers type library registration with the
> Registry table or with the TypeLib table.
>
WiX turns TypeLib (et al) authoring into Registry rows unless Advertise
is explicitly set to Yes.
--
sig://boB
http://bobs.org
--
I'm pretty sure you get a bunch of ICE 33 warnings with the typelib registry entries over the TypeLib table. I can vouch that the Registry Table route works. It is, I believe, the generally (arguably?) preferred way so msiexec can track the registry entries and uninstall them. But I needn't tell yo
Subject: [WiX-users] Installing shared assemblies
Thanks Mike for your earlier help with private assemblies. We've dropped
the idea of doing anything special with them but as expected we've moved
on to shared assemblies so I've got some more questions for anyone who
can help.
I've ta
Thanks Mike for your earlier help with private assemblies. We've dropped
the idea of doing anything special with them but as expected we've moved
on to shared assemblies so I've got some more questions for anyone who can
help.
I've taken one of our old COM dlls and added an AssemblyInfo.cpp wi
7 matches
Mail list logo