Out of interest, I upgraded to 3.0.1910.0 and the warnings dissapeared! It also runs MUCH faster!On 7/27/06, Shmarya Rubenstein <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I backed out of this a couple of months back because I was having difficulties... Let me see if I can find it in my source-control... otherwise
I backed out of this a couple of months back because I was having difficulties... Let me see if I can find it in my source-control... otherwise I can try and reproduce...On 7/26/06,
Rob Mensching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know that I had trouble with Component
referenceing because
inline
From: Shmarya
Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:20
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Ludlow;
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Fwd:
LGHT1055 InstallUISequence warning
Derek,
I hadn't thought of
, July 25, 2006 10:52
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Ludlow;
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Fwd:
LGHT1055 InstallUISequence warning
Inlining back :)
On 7/25/06, Derek
Cicerone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
inline
From: Shmarya Rubenstein [
k load-by-path is very powerful and useful, at almost no additional cost...
Thanks,
Derek
From: Shmarya
Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 10:52
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Ludlow;
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Fwd:
LGHT1055 Insta
I know that I had trouble with Component
referenceing because you can't reference a single component from multiple
features... at least, I couldn't get it to work...
[DerekC] You should absolutely be able to
reference a single component from multiple features using multiple ComponentRef
el
lto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Shmarya Rubenstein
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:37
AM
To: John Ludlow
Cc:
wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users]
Fwd: LGHT1055 InstallUISequence warning
I'm actually using a very similar pattern, with lots
of littl
can
handle all .net 2.0 assemblies fine.
Derek
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Shmarya Rubenstein
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 6:37
AM
To: John Ludlow
Cc: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Fwd:
LGHT1055 InstallUISequence warning
I
, 2006 6:37
AM
To: John Ludlow
Cc: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] Fwd:
LGHT1055 InstallUISequence warning
I'm actually using a very
similar pattern, with lots of little merge modules which group different
components, and 's between them. I find this to be a go
I'm actually using a very similar pattern, with lots of little merge modules which group different components, and 's between them. I find this to be a good pattern, as it helps with complex dependency chains - which simple component/feature relationships just don't cover
A couple of things whi
On 7/25/06, Shmarya Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It doesn't look like there are empty rows... I'll try dropping the table and let you know if that helps...
Ok. The only thing that made me think of that is the fact that, in the error, the name of the action is an empty string.
BTW: isn
It doesn't look like there are empty rows... I'll try dropping the table and let you know if that helps...BTW: isn't it an error that Wix generates empty tables which are optional?Also, have you tried merging multiple msm's with empty InstallUISequence tables?
On 7/25/06, John Ludlow <[EMAIL PROTEC
[forwarded to list]-- Forwarded message --From: John Ludlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 25, 2006 11:23 AMSubject: Re: [WiX-users] LGHT1055 InstallUISequence warningTo: Shmarya Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't think so - I have an empty InstallUISequence table in every one
13 matches
Mail list logo