where did you sequence it ?
it will need to between installInitialize and InstallFinalize but after
InstallFiles.
Zane Zeeh wrote:
>
> I have a custom action in my installer that uses installutil to register a
> snap-in for the MMC. It works fine except for when I install on Vista. On
> Vist
How can I set a condition on a standard action.
i.e. "CreateShortcuts", "My new condition here", 4000 <-- made the
sequence up.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Setting-standard-action-conditions-tp18626877p18626877.html
Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at N
ALLUSERS=2 will do per machine install when admin users are logged in (as
default)
Rob Mensching-2 wrote:
>
> Can you provide a bit more of the full scenario?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bir, Steve
> Sent: Wednesday, July 2
ICE30 and ICE38 are two quite different errors. ICE38 seems pertinent in this
case so I will assume you are talking about this.
When deploying files to a users profile if the file is a keypath to the
component the files fullpath will be written to the component's registry
i.e. c:\users\%usernam
=
>
>
> WixProject2: Product.wxs
> ==[BEGIN===
>
> http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/2006/wi";>
> Language="1033" Version="1.0.0.0" Manufacturer="WixProject2"
> UpgradeCode="04a4766b-1d31-4ab7-bb57-e5d5b02ad6de">
>
>
ents
> and their GUIDs, considering backwards compatibility with respect to
> multiple instances?
>
>
> [How does path (for file based component data) come into the picture? ]
>
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On B
hi chad,
in reading this further this doesn't seem to follow known logic. this could
easily be confirmed by monitoring the registry at the locations described in
my blog post before and after each installation. the logic you present in
this case doesn't match the logic I have accustomed myself t
HI Uttam,
LTNS. As a work around you could remove the CA decompile it into WiX then
add the CA back into WiX manually. I am not aware of the bug (mind you i
haven't been using wix for long).
Cheers,
John
Mathur, Uttam (GTS) wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While de-compiling an existing Wise MSI u
I have an xml solution detailed here.
It simply requires putting properties you want into an xml. The MSI consumes
the xml at runtime.
the example i have on the web is written in vbs (yeah i know most of you
dont like it, but due to IP reasons I cannot share the managed ver
hi all,
I think you may be getting confused with reference counting here. There are
two different types of reference count available. Once is windows based and
the other is windows installer based.
Windows reference counting is handled by setting a registry key which
monitors file actions.
Wi
Try dropping the function wrapping statements.
i.e. Function FireWallEntry / End Function
Then just leave VBScriptCall="" this way you can narrow down whether the
function is even being called.
Also ensure you have these attributes
Execute="deferred"
Impersonate="no"
Akshat Sharma wrot
early in the install, such as just after InstallInitialize"
> contradicts anything you're saying.
>
> Phil Wilson
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jmcfadyen
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008
the copy of the msi at c:\windows\installer is only a partial cache..
there are no files in this copy. As such any file replacements will use the
original install source as its healing point.
Rob Mensching-2 wrote:
>
> Something is causing "source resolution". Look in a verbose log file to
hmmm your wording is a little confusing.
the idea of using MM's is so that you gain referencing counting by proxy of
the components within the MM's being static.
this post explains exactly how component reference counting works.
http://johnmcfadyen.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!9DD01136FC094724!1
Phil are you sure about this.. (not trying to be difficult I would be
interested to understand what your getting at here.)
My understanding of the sequencing relating to upgrades is the opposite of
what you suggest.
by moving the RemoveExistingProducts action earlier in the sequences you are
ef
Hi all,
A nice example chris I never thought of that option.. I have done it
completely differently, my current code is quite messy as I was trying to
find a way to do this first. It really needs to be refactored using a
serializer or something.
We use a master xml file here which contains en
what I would do is create 3 components for your 3 certs.
Condition each of your components with a valid condition such as
PROD="true"
TESt="true" etc
then using an Immediate CA chop up the computer name or domain name env
var's then use the results to set the desired conditions to match the
Why do you want the mm's in the first place ? Is this for a reference count
scenario you are trying to fix ? Or are you just looking for an easy way to
install core components to multiple applications without the rework ?
Christopher Karper wrote:
>
> But the other installations are built wit
heres how to do what Neil mentioned.
http://johnmcfadyen.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!9DD01136FC094724!249.entry
Lio-2 wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I have a question on how to popup a warning mesagebox if there is old
> version already installed.
> I will appreciate any help.
>
> Backround:
where is this sequenced..
it needs to be after the installFiles action as you are using a file
installed during installation.
for more information on sequencing have a read of this.
http://johnmcfadyen.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!9DD01136FC094724!167.entry
shaan khan wrote:
>
> i have custo
here is a method I use to consume an xml file. You could get your server
application to generate an xml and let the client consume it during
installation.
http://johnmcfadyen.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!9DD01136FC094724!197.entry
Matthew Sheets wrote:
>
> To expand on some of the earlier sugg
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of jmcfadyen
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:51 PM
> To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [WiX-users] yep - back to being 100% frustrated
>
>
> It seems to me reading this from a link via Chris
It seems to me reading this from a link via Christopher Painter that you guys
are all missing a few vital points.
It looks to me like most of you looking at this as Dev's which is where you
are going wrong. I agree these items should be trivial to fix but there is a
vast number of regions outsid
23 matches
Mail list logo
