Of course, as soon as I write this I figure it out. Ignore please...
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/Chaining-MSPs-tp7591695p7594242.html
Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sorry to open a such an old thread, but I'm having some troubles with a very
similar situation as the one I previously described.
I ended up going with Rob's first suggestion - the Bundle has A.msi, B.msi,
C.msi, B.msp, and C.msp (B.msi and C.msi are not embedded and not included).
So far we have
Sorry to revive such an old thread, but I'm having some troubles with a very
similar situation as the one I previously described.
I ended up going with Rob's first suggestion - the Bundle has A.msi, B.msi,
C.msi, B.msp, and C.msp (B.msi and C.msi are not embedded and not included).
So far we have
I'm having a strange issue with an installer (using WiX and Burn). We've put
out about 15 updates (all major upgrades) without any problems. Now the
latest update is causing the icon on the desktop shortcut to disappear on XP
(leaving us with the default windows shortcut icon). The icon is fine
robmen wrote
> 1. One include the original B and C MSIs *plus* the new B and C MSPs in
> the updated Burn. Burn will only download the B and C MSIs if they are
> missing and Burn will slipstream the MSPs when possible.
This seems to work and give me the desired behavior. Thanks!
I also just foun
I asked this question previously in an older, slightly unrelated thread but
I'm thinking it might be more appropriate as its own thread.
I have a bundle (lets call it Bundle 1.0) with 3 MSIs (lets say A, B, and C;
also all version 1.0).
Some of the content in B and C has changed, so I produced an
We've decided to go with the approach you've suggested, and I will look into
delta patches to reduce the patch size (although since most of our changed
files will be videos, I would guess deltas wouldn't help much).
As far as each patch superseding the last, is this something we need to
specify in
This sounds like a good way to start at least. My one concern is what
happens when the accumulated patches start to get large enough to make size
a concern? Lets say the original data is 2GB, and every month we need to
release a patch that changes 5% of it. After 5 months we're up to a 500MB
acc
I am implementing a new installer for a product that needs to include several
GB of data. I'm planning on having a single MSI for the application, several
MSIs for the data, and using burn to chain everything together.
The data will change periodically and updates will be delivered online, so
pat
Forgot to mention, I am using WiX 3.7.
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/Force-Update-of-Corrupt-KeyPath-File-tp7587628p7587636.html
Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
10 matches
Mail list logo