Thanks Dave,
With the custom action the dual mode setup works in most scenarios - But...
Does not work for the following
Install base setup UI mode - in per machine context.
Next do a silent install for the upgrade setup.
We receive a UAC prompt to remove the cached msi ( for the base install) and
This is the source code from WIX Browse_dialog and InstallDirDlg, did you try
doing the same for your other dialog?
The below is from the browse dialog that shows up when user clicks on browse.
1
1
Belo
- Original Message -
> From: Mita Patel
> To: "wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net"
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 3:22 PM
> Subject: [WiX-users] Re Dual Mode Setups
>
> Question: How do you set the installcontext early enough in the Major Upgrade
> setup so that it finds the existing
Thanks for the question. Yes. One is used to set the install location. The
one I'm struggling with is the second one.
Thanks for any help!
Amanda
-Original Message-
From: Pavan Konduru [mailto:pavan.kond...@accelrys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 5:37 PM
To: General discussion about
Does the user have 2 separate browse dialogs during installation?
-Original Message-
From: Amanda Mallinger Reinartz [mailto:a...@metafile.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 3:18 PM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [WiX-users] Use Path from BrowseDlg to Set Registry Value (Not t
Dit mailadres is niet meer in gebruik. Mail kan je voortaan sturen naar
basti...@careercontrol.nl.
--
Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
• 3 signs your SCM is hindering your pro
Question: How do you set the installcontext early enough in the Major Upgrade
setup so that it finds the existing product's context to upgrade.
We created a Single Package authored MSI to target Win 7 +
To Identify setup package as a Dual Mode we set
ALLUSERS set to 2
MSIINSTALLPERUSER set to 1
I'm new to the list (and new to WiX). I've built a few installs, but I have
a new one that is giving me fits.
Can anyone share with me (or point me to a resource or disabuse me of false
notions) how I can set a property (not a Directory property) a user browsed
for (it's a mapped drive)? Why wo
Are MSIs allowed to have to have no Product Name? Or is this a case of (like
the version numbers) that ICE and other tools validate and yet the WI service
doesn't actually care, so all sorts of weird stuff can happen?
(I ask because I seem to have encountered such a thing, and the DTF demo
appl
Classification: Public
Thanks Carter!
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Carter Young [mailto:ecyo...@grandecom.net]
Sent: May-06-14 2:57 PM
To: wix-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] what exactly is this: WixMsiNetAssemblySupport?
This Snippet Searches for some required Ap
This Snippet Searches for some required App, as shown by After
AppSearch. If the App is found, it tests for .NET 3.5 SP1, all in a
running UI. This is best used in a Custom Install Dialog
NOT
NETFRAMEWORK35_SP_LEVEL
NOT
NETFRAMEWORK35_SP_LEVEL
This Snippet returns the SP L
It looks like that's a direct migration from a Visual Studio setup
project to WiX. The VS setups don't offer all the features that WiX
does, and in this case you probably don't need your own code to copy
files. Use the element in WiX. Also, you don't need
-install types of command lines to install
This may no longer be an option, but an external manifest to that exe
would disable its virtualization and make it require elevation.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/patricka/archive/2009/12/09/answers-to-several-application-manifest-mysteries-and-questions.aspx
---
Phil Wilson
On Tue, May 6
I can't find any help on it but I am curious what is the difference between
this:
NOT
NETFRAMEWORK35_SP_LEVEL
NOT
NETFRAMEWORK35_SP_LEVEL
and this:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download then restart the setup.">
NETFRAMEWORK35_SP_LEVEL = "#1"
thanks,
Steve
-
So the components in FeatureC can be installed as a standalone feature, but
those same components are needed by Features A and B?
I'd just include the components in all three features. And don't nest
Feature C inside Feature A or B.
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml
This is just a guess: when you referenced one component, you created a link
between the fragment and the main project. Now the linker will yell at you
if it finds anything orphaned in that fragment. On the other hand, when you
didn't link anything from the fragment to the project, the linker didn't
Hi Nick,
Thank you for your reply. I think that is a better fit. I have also thought
IExpress and VBScript might be a simpler approach.
I admit what I am doing is unusual. I have an old pre-Vista legacy app that
used HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE to store product key registration information. Under
V
You can use a VolumeSelectCombo UI control.
1
--
View this message in context:
http://windows-installer-xml-wix-toolset.687559.n2.nabble.com/Drive-selection-tp7594443p7594537.html
Sent from the wix-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Sorry, but I'm going to ask a few followup questions:
1. Does your custom action alter the user's computer at all?
2. I see the name "NewServerInstance". Is this by any chance creating a
website in IIS?
3. Is it necessary to create a custom table over using properties?
--
View this message
Upgrades are used to find and replace previously installed files. But if
there's nothing to replace, there's nothing to say the install can't
continue as a fresh install. If you need to not run the installer at all if
a previous install isn't there then try using a launch condition
(http://wixtools
See this Page:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa372835(v=vs.85).aspx
2819:
Control [3] on dialog [2] needs a property linked to it.
One of the Custom Controls oon this dialog is missing a Property
Id/@Value Pair
Carter
Quoting Namrata Kumari :
> I am getting 2819 error on clicking
Hello!
I have wxs project file:
...
My Custom actions:
And InstallExecuteSequence:
My custom auction do CopyFile in Program Files directory.
I have UAC with maximum level. I run my
I am getting 2819 error on clicking “Next” button in WelcomeDlg. Please help.
1
1
1
1
1
1
No, it is not I am talking about. Remote payload is just an option to
verify my exepackage, isn't it? Even if not, it is still trying to find
redist/netfx(...) during compile. Can I compile a bootstrapper without that
file in order to make a bootstrapper which is designed only for download
package
24 matches
Mail list logo