Fair enough. I guess I took silence as a lack of interest and didn't
appropriately weight the fact that slow updates to CVS would prevent
interest (yes, sometimes I'm slow ).
I have been investigating CodePlex ever since they added Mercurial support.
Given the number of comments here about the pre
Yes. One of the reasons I've been slacking on CVS is because I've been
looking into other options. Mercurial is my personal favorite right now.
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Dieter Lunn wrote:
> Has there been any discussion of moving to a different VCS like SVN,
> Git or Mercurial?
>
> Diete
I agree with that, if it were on codeplex, I would probably be more apt to dig
through the source myself to work through some of the things that give me fits.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Sleightholm [mailto:n...@x2systems.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 5:49 PM
To: General discussi
This should be helpful.
http://schemas.microsoft.com/wix/2006/wi";>
NOT Installed
AND NOT OLDERVERSION_BEINGUPGRADED AND NOT NEWERVERSION_INSTALLED
OLDERVERSION_BEINGUPGRADED AND NOT
(REMOVE="ALL")
Installed AND
(REMOVE="ALL") AND NOT (OLDERVERSION_BEINGUPGR
Your custom action DLL is dynamically linked and requires the Visual Studio
runtime (if you install it, it works). You need to change how the DLL links to
MSVCRT if you want to redistribute your installer without the Microsoft Visual
C++ 2008 SP1 Redistributable Package. Alternately you may boot
You might consider an alternate wix extension for Sql databases,
http://msiext.codeplex.com.
dB. @ dblock.org
Moscow|Geneva|Seattle|New York
-Original Message-
From: Will Sullivan [mailto:wsulli...@softdocs.com]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 2:14 PM
To: WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
I would like to see it on Codeplex like other Microsoft projects.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Dieter Lunn [mailto:coder2...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 April 2010 23:43
To: General discussion for Windows Installer XML toolset.
Subject: Re: [WiX-users] WiX 3.5 Source Code
Has there been any di
Rob, The CVS issues were fixed for 3.0 but unless I am mistaken 3.5 is not
fixed (updated just before this email) I have reported this several times but
nothing has changed.
In my opinion the issue is this is supposed to be open/community source but the
source doesn't build (even last week's z
Has there been any discussion of moving to a different VCS like SVN,
Git or Mercurial?
Dieter Lunn
http://www.coder2000.ca
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Rob Mensching wrote:
> Stephen,
>
> Sorry, the lack of CVS updates is my fault. CVS has been giving me fits
> lately and I have not been p
Stephen,
Sorry, the lack of CVS updates is my fault. CVS has been giving me fits
lately and I have not been prioritizing getting to the root of the issues
because I didn't think anyone really cared. Neil is one of about three
people that have *ever* asked about CVS and I don't think he hasn't aske
... fine, but as you've said, the blog entry is from 2008 and some of the
software modules mentioned there is even no longer available (e.g. Sandbox help
compiler 1.7)...
It's not the question on building extensions. I would like to apply some of the
patches mentioned in SF bug tracking because
Good to hear that. The bugs were being worked on. Lots of things were being
worked on. Often it takes a while for everything to get fixed. We appreciate
the bug reports *and* time to fix them.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Will Sullivan wrote:
> Latest update fixes all my woes!
>
> -Origi
I asked a similar question sometime ago and I believe the official
source is held within Microsoft and then republished to CVS. The copy in
CVS tends to lag behind the wix-sources.zip as republishing is manual.
There are also issues with the CVS copy in that it has quite a lot of
broken binary file
13 matches
Mail list logo
