Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-16 Thread Hansang Bae
> On 12/03/2008, *Hansang Bae* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >It is within the limits of ntp. Unless there is a WAN involved, the >packets are flying around at an order of magnitude faster than what ntp >can provide (ms resolution) Fabiana moreno wrote: > so ... it is not re

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread ximena cardozo
der running a wire between the > > > > parallel ports and code something to check the exact time when you flip > > > > a > > > > switch or something. Then you would have a trigger time for both. > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ > >

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Fabiana moreno
omething to check the exact time when you flip a > > > switch or something. Then you would have a trigger time for both. > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Martin Mathieson
/manualpeerlist:[IP to synchronize to] /update > > /syncfromflags:MANUAL > > > > > > > > and then monitor the time difference with: > > > > w32tm /stripchart /computer:[IP to synchronize to] > > > > > > > > ,you always can ha

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Fabiana moreno
ilto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Martin Mathieson > *Sent:* March 13, 2008 12:13 PM > *To:* Community support list for Wireshark > *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation > > > > If you have console / command prompt of some type, most op

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Rob MacKenzie
. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Mathieson Sent: March 13, 2008 12:13 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation If you have console / command prompt of some type, most

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Martin Mathieson
gt; w32tm /stripchart /computer:[IP to synchronize to] > > > > > > > > ,you always can have a delay reference by pinging and dividing by 2 > > > > the RTT. > > > > > > > > HTH > > > > Juan > > > > > > > &g

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Fabiana moreno
> > > > > > and then monitor the time difference with: > > > w32tm /stripchart /computer:[IP to synchronize to] > > > > > > ,you always can have a delay reference by pinging and dividing by 2 > > > the RTT. > > > > > > HTH > > > Juan &

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Martin Mathieson
gt; > -- > > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *ext Fabiana moreno > > *Sent:* Miércoles, 12 de Marzo de 2008 09:38 a.m. > > *To:* Community support list for Wireshark > > *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-users] e

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Fabiana moreno
; [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *ext Fabiana moreno > *Sent:* Miércoles, 12 de Marzo de 2008 09:38 a.m. > *To:* Community support list for Wireshark > *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation > > so ... it is not reliable if i substract the time i hav in

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread Martin Mathieson
g and dividing by 2 the > RTT. > > HTH > Juan > > > -- > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *ext Fabiana moreno > *Sent:* Miércoles, 12 de Marzo de 2008 09:38 a.m. > *To:* Community support list for Wireshark > *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-use

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-13 Thread juan.wortley
Sent: Miércoles, 12 de Marzo de 2008 09:38 a.m. To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation so ... it is not reliable if i substract the time i hav in the client minus the time i have in the server

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-12 Thread Fabiana moreno
so ... it is not reliable if i substract the time i hav in the client minus the time i have in the server to get my end the end delay? On 12/03/2008, Hansang Bae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fabiana moreno wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > I know wireshark is not able to calculate the end-to-end d

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-11 Thread Hansang Bae
Fabiana moreno wrote: > Hello there, > > I know wireshark is not able to calculate the end-to-end delay of a > packet when streaming. I was just wondering if adjusting the clocks of > my two computers(sender and receiver) to the network time protocol and > having the sniffer at both ends i coul

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-11 Thread Jake Peavy
On 3/11/08, Fabiana moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello there, > > I know wireshark is not able to calculate the end-to-end delay of a packet > when streaming. I was just wondering if adjusting the clocks of my two > computers(sender and receiver) to the network time protocol and having the

Re: [Wireshark-users] end-to-end delay calculation

2008-03-11 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Sounds possible, but watch out, read this first: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Timestamps Thanx, Jaap Fabiana moreno wrote: > Hello there, > > I know wireshark is not able to calculate the end-to-end delay of a > packet when streaming. I was just wondering if adjusting the clocks of > my two