Looking at this email:
http://www.ethereal.com/lists/ethereal-users/200606/msg00170.html
It looks like this person may have been unwittingly distributed a
patched version of ethereal including support for WiMAX (the filename
doesn't match the files we now have for the air interface
protocols)...
Sergey Antoniuk wrote:
> I used WinPcap 3.01 version (or something like this). I saw DL and UL
> maps in ethereal and nothing more.
No Ethereal release I know of had WiMAX dissection support; presumably
the DL-MAP and UL-MAP messages just showed up as raw data, unless you
had a WiMAX plugin of
I used WinPcap 3.01 version (or something like this). I saw DL and UL maps in
ethereal and nothing more.
With Wireshark i see nothing at all, the WinPcap version is 4.0.1 (installed
during WinPcap installation). I'm not familiar with WinDump so unfortunately i
didn't use it.
Guy Harris <[EMA
Sergey Antoniuk wrote:
> I tried to capture the traffic with Ethereal before I found the
> Wireshark (now I know that they are the same).
> To your questions:
>
>1. I'm using Wimax network adapter
>2. The OS is Win XP, SP2.
What version of WinPcap did you have when you were capturing wi
Hi Guy.
I tried to capture the traffic with Ethereal before I found the Wireshark
(now I know that they are the same).
To your questions:
I'm using Wimax network adapter
The OS is Win XP, SP2.
I'll be glad to provide more details I just don't know what is relevant.
Guy Harris
Sergey Antoniuk wrote:
> I'm trying to capture WiMAX messages using Wireshark 0.99.6 on Win XP
> and there is nothing. I tried to do the same with Ethereal and i succeed
> to capture WiMAX messages.
"Wireshark" and "Ethereal" are the same application; releases up to
0.99.0 were called "Etherea