On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 07:40:54PM -0500, joans4nz wrote:
> 2008/2/20, Hansang Bae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > joans4nz wrote:
> > > I'm a network administrator in my new job and when I ran Wireshark I saw
> > > to much ARP traffic level and Ntop show 86% broadcast traffic to.
>
> > 86% of TOTAL
2008/2/20, Hansang Bae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> joans4nz wrote:
> > I'm a network administrator in my new job and when I ran Wireshark I saw
> > to much ARP traffic level and Ntop show 86% broadcast traffic to.
> >
> > There are DHCP server and 350 Windows stations. My boss dont know
> > nothing ab
Hansang Bae asked a great question.
I have hung myself by setting up Mulitcast on a device in a legacy (FAT
LARGE ) network. In doing so i only thought about L3.. well multicast
uses the same L2 flag as bcast.!
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 19:22 -0500, Hansang Bae wrote:
> joans4nz wrote:
> > I'm
joans4nz wrote:
> I'm a network administrator in my new job and when I ran Wireshark I saw
> to much ARP traffic level and Ntop show 86% broadcast traffic to.
>
> There are DHCP server and 350 Windows stations. My boss dont know
> nothing about networks and I propose to my boss buy a layer 3 swi
o Router interface
Buffer misses <25 /hr
Hope this helps.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joans4nz
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 2:44 PM
To: wireshark-users@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-users] High broadcast traffic
Hi,
I'm a network administrator in my new job and when I ran Wireshark I saw to
much ARP traffic level and Ntop show 86% broadcast traffic to.
There are DHCP server and 350 Windows stations. My boss dont know nothing
about networks and I propose to my boss buy a layer 3 switch and create
vlans to
