Re: [Wireshark-users] Having problem tracing multiple ip addresses

2021-04-27 Thread Robert Blair
ilterered? > Let's make sure we look at solving the right problem. > > Regards, Hugo. > > -Original Message- > From: Wireshark-users On Behalf Of > Robert Blair > Sent: Friday, 23 April 2021 20:36 > To: wireshaer > Subject: [Wireshark-users] Having probl

Re: [Wireshark-users] Having problem tracing multiple ip addresses

2021-04-26 Thread Hugo van der Kooij via Wireshark-users
users On Behalf Of Robert Blair Sent: Friday, 23 April 2021 20:36 To: wireshaer Subject: [Wireshark-users] Having problem tracing multiple ip addresses I changed three IoT devices from DHCP to static addresses so I could trace all three of them. when I enter "net 192.168.60.201" in the

Re: [Wireshark-users] Having problem tracing multiple ip addresses

2021-04-23 Thread Ricardo Díez Antequera
Have you used 192.168.60.200 (the subnet address) or 192.168.60.203 (the broadcast address for the subnet) for a device? Those addresses are reserved in your subnet and could cause errors in tcpdump engine. A /30 subnet only supports 2 hosts. Regards, Ricardo Robert Blair escribió

Re: [Wireshark-users] Having problem tracing multiple ip addresses

2021-04-23 Thread chuck c
You will probably get more feedback on the Wireshark Q&A site: https://ask.wireshark.org/questions/ If you open a question there, include the output of "wireshark -v" or "tshark -v". These include OS information and version info for the libraries and program. Maybe throw in "netstat -nr" (if it's

[Wireshark-users] Having problem tracing multiple ip addresses

2021-04-23 Thread Robert Blair
I changed three IoT devices from DHCP to static addresses so I could trace all three of them. when I enter "net 192.168.60.201" in the capture filter I get all traffic to and from the ip. If I enter "net 192.168.60.200/30" I get all fraffic from the ip addresses but none going to the ip addresses