> Do I have to take timestamp of sending original report always as 0.0
> secs?
>
No, just work out the difference in time between the 2 packets
involved in the calculation - it really isn't difficult. Experiment
with the different views in 'View | Time DisplayFormat' and work out
what they
Hi!! Martin,
Im calculating the delay as u hav told, I have another question about it:
Do I have to take timestamp of sending original report always as 0.0 secs?
Because If i dont do that I get a negative value. I apply the filter rtcp in
wireshark so that i can only see rtc
Hi!! Martin,
Im calculating the delay as u hav told, I have another question about it:
Do I have to take timestamp of sending original report always as 0.0 secs?
Because If i dont do that I get a negative value. I apply the filter rtcp in
wireshark so that i can only see rtc
Aha! ok now I get it. Its actually the 13 ms which is the actual network
propagation delay then 13 ms is quite an acceptable value. The values for delay
which I had sent u are from the books which Im using as reference. The authors
are all german a Mr. Mathias Hein (Voice over IP Professional Se
On 5/23/07, Eram Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok!! I tried out with the view option and it works. Im surprised that its so
> easy to do it and I was using these complex calculations all the time. So
> 1932 ms is the round trip delay of the packets u sent me. Isnt it a high
> value coz wat I re
Ok!! I tried out with the view option and it works. Im surprised that its so
easy to do it and I was using these complex calculations all the time. So 1932
ms is the round trip delay of the packets u sent me. Isnt it a high value coz
wat I read round trip delay (d) should be
less than 150
Just choose 'View | Time Display Format | Seconds since previous
Displayed Packet', and you'll see that they are 1932ms apart. (I
can't follow your calculations where you try to convert the absolute
time to milliseconds - you don't need to do this).
Martin
On 5/22/07, Eram Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi!! Martin, well your explanation was quite helpful but I still have some
queries.
I used your 2 frames to do the delay calculation, I still get a negative
value. Maybe I am not calculating it correctly. Im using the 2 frames u hav
send to show it to u, maybe u can detect my mistake:
De
On 5/22/07, Eram Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!! I am Eram Khan from Germany. Studying Computer Enginerring at the
Niederrhein University of Applied Sciences and currently busy with my thesis
project.
I am testing the VoIP connections of a firm here in Germany with wireshark
0.99.5. T
