On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:59:10PM -0800, Jehanzeb Khan wrote:
> Stephen i think you meant to say 'divide' by 8 to go from MBit/Sec to
> MB[yte]/sec :)
You're right, thanks for catching that. I wasn't thinking when I posted
that.
Steve
___
Wiresh
unless you use >=1GbE or FC physical layers where there are 10 bits
per byte in the physical transport.
(but we never see the real physical layer in wireshark anyway)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Stephen Fisher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:45:12PM -0800, Greg Reed
Stephen i think you meant to say 'divide' by 8 to go from MBit/Sec to
MB[yte]/sec :)
Regards
Jehanzeb Khan
Stephen Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:45:12PM -0800, Greg Reed wrote:
> For MB/sec would I move the decimal point 2 places to the right from
> the
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:45:12PM -0800, Greg Reed wrote:
> For MB/sec would I move the decimal point 2 places to the right from
> the output of MBit/sec?
There are 8 bits in a byte, so you would actually multiply the MBit/sec
by 8 to get MB[yte]/sec.
Steve
_
Greetings-
I am new to using Wireshark and was looking at the Average MBit/sec under the
Summary pick of the Statistics tab.
For MB/sec would I move the decimal point 2 places to the right from the output
of MBit/sec?
Thanks for the help,
Greg
__
