[Wireshark-users] Getting rid of the router chatter

2007-11-23 Thread michael butler
How do I get rid/stop capture of the constant 20+ packets a second sent from router to pc/pc to router? With one capture session I have hundreds of these packets. Michael ___ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark

Re: [Wireshark-users] Trying to get Wireshark up and running via MacPorts [SOLVED, I THINK]

2007-11-23 Thread Kok-Yong Tan
On Nov 23, 2007, at 20:27, Stephen Fisher wrote: > When you have the source build manually in the build directory, you'll > want to use glibtool (normally named libtool, except on OS X, which > has > a libtool program that does something totally different) to run > Wireshark through the gdb deb

Re: [Wireshark-users] Trying to get Wireshark up and running via MacPorts

2007-11-23 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:49:48PM -0500, Kok-Yong Tan wrote: > I'm currently in the middle of a "sudo port -Rv install wireshark" > after doing a "sudo port clean wireshark". I'll try downloading the > source and then building directly after my build using MacPorts. > However, I haven't used gd

Re: [Wireshark-users] Trying to get Wireshark up and running via MacPorts

2007-11-23 Thread Kok-Yong Tan
On Nov 23, 2007, at 18:08, Stephen Fisher wrote: >> There are no warnings or errors whatsoever during the builds of >> Wireshark or Macports but when I try to fire up Wireshark from a >> xterm >> window under /Utilities/X11, I get a bus error. > > That's odd. Can you try building from our sourc

Re: [Wireshark-users] Trying to get Wireshark up and running via MacPorts

2007-11-23 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:15:59PM -0500, Kok-Yong Tan wrote: > I'm having a problem getting Wireshark up and running via MacPorts and > X11 on a 8GB RAM, 140GB free drive space, dual 2GHz G5 tower system > with OS X version 10.4.11 and with X11 Update 2006 applied (providing > me with X11 v1.1.3)

Re: [Wireshark-users] UDP stream graph

2007-11-23 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:02:30PM +0100, Varga D?vid wrote: > Could you please add a feature that generates UDP throughput graphs? > It'd be the same as 'statistics / TCP stream graph / throughput > graph', but following an UDP stream. > > I'd really need it to analyze video streams in highly lo

[Wireshark-users] UDP stream graph

2007-11-23 Thread Varga Dávid
Hello! Could you please add a feature that generates UDP throughput graphs? It'd be the same as 'statistics / TCP stream graph / throughput graph', but following an UDP stream. I'd really need it to analyze video streams in highly loaded 802.11 networks with or without WMM. Thank you very

Re: [Wireshark-users] SNMP MIBs & Wireshark 0.99.7pre1

2007-11-23 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, It is on the roadmap for 0.99.7, but since this mad dash to release is happening, I'm not sure it's gonna make it. Thanx, Jaap Keith French wrote: > When some early development builds were released for 0.99.7, the SNMP > Preferences no longer had the option to load extra MIBs. Looking at

Re: [Wireshark-users] [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark 0.99.7pre1 is now available

2007-11-23 Thread Kaul
It crashes on reassembling a segmented XML (over HTTP - I reckon an RSS feed). I thought all along it had something to do with my (yet unaccepted) changes to packet-http.c and req_resp_hrds.c , so didn't want to bother the list with it, but it just happened with a clean install of the binary as wel

[Wireshark-users] SNMP MIBs & Wireshark 0.99.7pre1

2007-11-23 Thread Keith French
When some early development builds were released for 0.99.7, the SNMP Preferences no longer had the option to load extra MIBs. Looking at 0.99.7pre1 this would still seem to be the case. I know that someone was rewriting the SNMP dissector, will this be completed by the final release of this v

[Wireshark-users] Wireshark 0.99.7pre1 & G729 Codec

2007-11-23 Thread Keith French
I read earlier in the forum about the possibility of including an open source G729 audio codec. I have just tried the RTP player within 0.99.7pre1 and it does not complain of an unsupported codec on a G729a call, but the audio is silent. Has this been successfully implemented as yet & if so wha