Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Tennis Smith
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:48:00PM -0700, Tennis Smith wrote: > Cool idea! > > I'm googling as we speak. ;-) Oh, if you look for a Windows program doing the same, google for PRTG :) [TNS>] Good idea. Will have a look. Cheers, Sake ___ Wireshark-use

Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Sake Blok
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:48:00PM -0700, Tennis Smith wrote: > Cool idea! > > I'm googling as we speak. ;-) Oh, if you look for a Windows program doing the same, google for PRTG :) Cheers, Sake ___ Wireshark-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http

Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Tennis Smith
Yep. That's what I was afraid of. I'm gonna explore the snmp idea. Thanks, -T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 1:55 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL P

Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Tennis Smith
Cool idea! I'm googling as we speak. ;-) Thanks for the great input. -T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sake Blok Sent: Friday, April 13, 2007 2:05 PM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Do

Re: [Wireshark-users] Decoding AOL Email Packets

2007-04-13 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:36:50PM -0400, John Dowse wrote: > I have the captured packet and can decode them as smtp packets or AIM. > I can see the routing information and the subject line, but the > message body is not legible. How do i decode the actual message > itself? Any help would be gr

Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Sake Blok
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 01:54:52PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In my case, there isn???t any need to capture data. I only want to measure > traffic rates. Wouldn't it be far more easy to read out the interface statistics with snmp? You might want to check mrtg. Cheers, Sake ___

Re: [Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Randy . Grein
No. The setup will appear to work, but of course the switch interface will be overwhelmed as soon as PC traffic goes above 100 MBits/s. To be technically accurate most switches will attempt to buffer the overflow which will average out traffic rates just above 100 Mbits. And of course you have

[Wireshark-users] Can This Be Done?

2007-04-13 Thread Tennis Smith
Hi, I have a wireshark pc with a 10/100 nic connected to a switch. The port attached to the pc is getting data mirrored from a 1Gig port passing traffic. So, in other words, the w/s pc is sniffing a port that could run as fast as 1gig (see below). 1g 1g PC1--Switch---

[Wireshark-users] Decoding AOL Email Packets

2007-04-13 Thread John Dowse
Hey All, I have the captured packet and can decode them as smtp packets or AIM. I can see the routing information and the subject line, but the message body is not legible. How do i decode the actual message itself? Any help would be greatly appreciated. ___

Re: [Wireshark-users] Malformed SSL - Is it really?

2007-04-13 Thread Sake Blok
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:24:48PM -0400, Small, James wrote: > > > > > [Malformed Packet: SSL] > > > > > > > > Is the packet really malformed, or is it possible that Wireshark > > > > doesn't support the cipher being used? If so, is there any way to > > > > tell if the packet is really malformed