Re: [Wireshark-users] Save the bytes of a particular field from all the displayed packets in one file

2007-02-10 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:12:36PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote: > To be clear, you're not attempting at getting streaming audio or > video, it's just fixed-length files within transfer protocols such FTP > or HTTP, right? Right. Steve ___ Wireshark-use

Re: [Wireshark-users] Save the bytes of a particular field from all the displayed packets in one file

2007-02-10 Thread Frank Bulk
Stephen: It's great that you're willing to give your time to this project. To be clear, you're not attempting at getting streaming audio or video, it's just fixed-length files within transfer protocols such FTP or HTTP, right? Frank -Original Message- From: Stephen Fisher [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Wireshark-users] Save the bytes of a particular field from all the displayed packets in one file

2007-02-10 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:54:48PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote: > Anyone reading the last few weeks of postings should be detecting a > recurring theme...people want to extract images and audio with the > correct file headers and names from packet streams that may or may not > be contiguous. I'm w

Re: [Wireshark-users] Help. I do not know much about anything.... I am trying to see if a wireless connection between 2

2007-02-10 Thread Frank Bulk
Andreas: Thanks for your detailed response. I don't question the value of G.729, which has the largest installed base with the best trade-off in terms of voice quality and bandwidth. But your previous statement said that most modern IP phones use G.729. They may support it, but I don't think

Re: [Wireshark-users] Help. I do not know much about anything.... Iamtrying to see if a wireless connection between 2

2007-02-10 Thread Andreas Fink
On 10.02.2007, at 17:44, Frank Bulk wrote: Andreas: On what basis do you say that most modern IP phones use G.729? Is there a certain class of IP phones (PacketCable, Vonage, 8x8, enterprise (Cisco, Avaya, etc), VoFi) that you had in mind? Frank G.729 is one of the best codecs when i

[Wireshark-users] Tracing packets _after_ they're received?

2007-02-10 Thread Dev Null
I suspect this is a stupid question, but is there any way to trace what happens to the packets _after_ they arrive on my local machine? A different tool perhaps? I'm trying to debug a VPN connection on a Windows XP machine. I can see packets arriving from the server (on my machine, in wiresha

Re: [Wireshark-users] 0.99.5 and Adware

2007-02-10 Thread Gerald Combs
Gary Chaulklin wrote: > 2/10/2007 Installed 0.99.5 using: > http://wireshark.osmirror.nl/download/win32/wireshark-setup-0.99.5.exe > > In addition to a few WinPcap 4.0 Setup errors in the attached, I got an > adware warning from McAfee (also in the attached). The adware message > appeared as the

Re: [Wireshark-users] Help. I do not know much about anything.... Iamtrying to see if a wireless connection between 2

2007-02-10 Thread Frank Bulk
Andreas: On what basis do you say that most modern IP phones use G.729? Is there a certain class of IP phones (PacketCable, Vonage, 8x8, enterprise (Cisco, Avaya, etc), VoFi) that you had in mind? Frank _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Fink Sen

Re: [Wireshark-users] Network Interface not getting detected

2007-02-10 Thread Midhun Chandran
Hi Gianluca, I have tried Wireshark-0.99.5 which uses WinPcap-4.0, and saw the same behavior that no interfaces are getting detected. Thanks, Midhun > Can you please try WinPcap 4.0? > > Have a nice day > Gianluca Varenni > WinPcap Team > > > - Original Message - > From: "Midhun Chandr