Hi,
Well, you really have to point us in the direction of the protocol spec
before we can do anything.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Jee Kay wrote:
> On 06/11/06, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's an XML based protocol, but closed to the public. See
> > http://www.eurexchange.co
Phil,
Did you ever find a solution to your problem? I am experiencing a very similar problem, and would like to hear what you might have found.
Regards,
Curtis
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/ma
I could not interprete this results especially on the 16k REQUEST SIZE when i used the average response time. I will appreciate your explanation. Also if those response time unit is in seconds, I think it is very slow.I hope i am convinced
Sponsored LinkMortgage rates near historic lows: $
On 06/11/06, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's an XML based protocol, but closed to the public. See
> http://www.eurexchange.com/download/documents/circulars/cf0622006e.pdf
That's some Eurex product (reporting) which is unfortunately
completely unrelated to the market data protocol :)
I am trying to setup the SSL Decryption feature of WireShark
using version 0.99.4. I have been unsuccessful in get the decryption to work so
far. I have included the SSL Debug file in the email. I believe the problem is
that WireShark is automatically adding associations that are overriding
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:38:21PM -0800, Bob Carlson wrote:
> Has the ability to decode WPA/2 in 802.11 been added to Wireshark yet?
> I don't want to go thru the pain of upgrading otherwise.
Nope, sorry.
Steve
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wire
Sorry I left the subject blank. My bad.
Cheers, Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Carlson
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 2:38 PM
> To: Wireshark Users
> Subject:
>
> Has the ability to decode WPA/2 in 802.11 been added to Wireshark yet? I
> don't want to go thru the pain of upgradi
Has the ability to decode WPA/2 in 802.11 been added to Wireshark yet? I
don't want to go thru the pain of upgrading otherwise.
Thanks, Bob
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wiresha
You can turn off the verification of IP, TCP, or UDP checksums in the
preferences.
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:20:41PM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The answer is staring you in the face:
>
> ...(maybe caused by checksum offloading?)
>
> Google for "checksum offloading" and you'll s
On 11/6/06, master mine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What is the default time unit of service response time in wireshark?
> (microseconds or millisecs)?
seconds
>
> What is the effect of block size on average response time calculation in
> SCSI?
should not have much influence. rotationa
Any Wimax technology related protocol support on wireshark?
Allan
___
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
Sam,
When you capture on a high speed network, try using dumpcap instead Wireshark
for the actual packet capture. Dumpcap comes with Wireshark but just captures
packets. It should be in your Wireshark install directory. I learned this
from someone else on the list. My experience has been th
What is the default time unit of service response time in wireshark? (microseconds or millisecs)? What is the effect of block size on average response time calculation in SCSI? Is Read SRT supposed to be greater than Write SRT?.. If so, why? Please i dont mind if there is a website i
Hi all,
I'm new to the users mailing list and
have had limited experience with Ethereal/WireShark. Most of my experience
has been with tracing 10/100 mb. ethernet.
I've had a couple of requests to trace
a wired gigabit network. I'm using an IBM Thinkpad T42. It's a 1.7 Ghz
Pentium M running Windo
If it is XML, that's a (relatively) easy job...
- first take a look to http://wiki.wireshark.org/XML to know what you
are to face
- take a look at one of the eurex packets
- what's the http Content-Type (or else tell us what protocol
encapsulates it)
-create a dummy dtd file called eurex.d
Hi,
It's an XML based protocol, but closed to the public. See
http://www.eurexchange.com/download/documents/circulars/cf0622006e.pdf
Thanx,
Jaap
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, LEGO wrote:
> On 11/6/06, Jee Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Working in the financial services industry I frequently find myse
On 11/6/06, Jee Kay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Working in the financial services industry I frequently find myself
> having to debug the multicast streams of Eurex and the CME price
> feeds.
>
> I was wondering if anyone has a wireshark dissector available for
> either of these two protocols, or
Working in the financial services industry I frequently find myself
having to debug the multicast streams of Eurex and the CME price
feeds.
I was wondering if anyone has a wireshark dissector available for
either of these two protocols, or could point me in the direction of
who might / how to go a
Hi,
The answer is staring you in the face:
...(maybe caused by checksum offloading?)
Google for "checksum offloading" and you'll see why.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Luca Lusso wrote:
> Hi, I'm using wireshark 0.99.3 to monitor network traffic on my w2k3 domain
> controller. I've
Hi, I'm using wireshark 0.99.3 to monitor network traffic on my w2k3 domain controller. I've a lot of IP packet with:checksum: 0x [incorrect, should be 0x (maybe caused by checksum offloading?)]where are exadecimal number.
I'get this only when ip.scr is the domain controller (when doma
20 matches
Mail list logo
