Hi,
This starts to resemble the Linux kernel merge window challenges. There's always
a tradeoff between ease of development vs. churn. Things do need to settle down
before a branch can be made, that's what we're here for.
Personally I'm in the process of finalizing a new dissector (for iperf3)
I'm not sure I follow. I don't know why things would settle down before
a branch is made. That's exactly my point, the master branch should be
unaffected by the release schedule IMO. Things settle down after the
branch is created, not before.
If the policy I outline before is followed there's
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 12:52 PM John Dill
wrote:
> >Message: 2
> >Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:24:19 -0400
> >From: John Thacker
> >To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] question on validation of a dissected
> >string from a BASE_CUSTOM hf item
> >Messag
On Sep 7, 2023, at 9:15 AM, John Dill wrote:
> I have a question whether I can get the dissected string of the BASE_CUSTOM
> header field so that I can do analysis on it and convert it to floating point
> to do range analysis so I can issue an expert info if the value is valid but
> out of ran
