On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 5:37 AM Tomasz Moń wrote:
> The advantage of 1) over 2) is the ability to be able, if the CRC is
> incorrect, to tell what the correct CRC should have been.
> Approach 2) allows only to veify if the CRC is correct - but at the
> advantage of being able to take full bytes as
The immediate purpose is to share my github contribution (Lua post-dissector)
at https://wiki.wireshark.org/Contrib
May have more later
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:https://www.wireshark.org/lists/
On Saturday, July 20, 2019, 9:10:36 AM, Tomasz Mon wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 5:37 AM Tomasz Mon wrote:
>> The advantage of 1) over 2) is the ability to be able, if the CRC is
>> incorrect, to tell what the correct CRC should have been.
>> Approach 2) allows only to veify if the CRC is corre
On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 8:42 PM John Sullivan wrote:
> One of the properties of LFSRs is that a 1 bit in the input toggles a
> completely predictable set of register bits *at any point in the
> future*. This isn't often useful for most CRC caculations on variable
> sized input, as the cost of work
