Re: [Wireshark-dev] Lua 5.3

2016-08-20 Thread Peter Wu
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:38:57PM +0100, João Valverde wrote: > > > On 08/19/2016 04:05 PM, João Valverde wrote: > > > > > > On 08/19/2016 03:56 PM, João Valverde wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 08/19/2016 02:54 PM, Peter Wu wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:17:35PM +0100, João Valverde

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Lua 5.3

2016-08-20 Thread João Valverde
On 08/20/2016 01:18 PM, Peter Wu wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:38:57PM +0100, João Valverde wrote: On 08/19/2016 04:05 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/19/2016 03:56 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/19/2016 02:54 PM, Peter Wu wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:17:35PM +0100, João Valve

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Lua 5.3

2016-08-20 Thread João Valverde
On 08/20/2016 02:03 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/20/2016 01:18 PM, Peter Wu wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:38:57PM +0100, João Valverde wrote: On 08/19/2016 04:05 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/19/2016 03:56 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/19/2016 02:54 PM, Peter Wu wrote: On M

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Lua 5.3

2016-08-20 Thread João Valverde
On 08/20/2016 02:06 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/20/2016 02:03 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/20/2016 01:18 PM, Peter Wu wrote: On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:38:57PM +0100, João Valverde wrote: On 08/19/2016 04:05 PM, João Valverde wrote: On 08/19/2016 03:56 PM, João Valverde wrote:

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Lua 5.3

2016-08-20 Thread João Valverde
If 5.3 compatibility is added it should be no problem. After looking at the actual changes (https://www.lua.org/manual/5.3/readme.html#changes and also the linked incompatibilities), I see the following changes to the Lua code: - 64-bit integer support. Nice! A bit more than nice. I'm seeing