> On 30 Sep 2015, at 02:34, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
> Unless anyone has any objections I'd like to create the Wireshark
> master-2.0 branch this upcoming Monday, October 5 followed by the 2.0rc1
> release in mid to late October.
>
> The big, obvious change for 2.0 will be the new UI. As the page
Hi all,
in my company we just received the following email from Symantec indicating
that the EV signing will soon be mandatory:
"On October 27, 2015, all new Kernel and User Mode driver submissions will
need to be made via the Windows Hardware Developer Center Dashboard portal
and signed by an Ex
But doesn't any of these potential representations (mostly network prefix)
require a specific field type (and not a display type) for display filtering
purposes?
-Original Message-
From: Jeffrey Smith
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Thu, Oct 1, 2015 1:46 am
Subject:
> On Oct 1, 2015, at 08:35, mman...@netscape.net wrote:
>
> But doesn't any of these potential representations (mostly network prefix)
> require a specific field type (and not a display type) for display filtering
> purposes?
>
I don't think so. You can use an FT_UINT32 and just tweak the df
Hi,
Use of variadic macros has been discussed in the past
(https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201209/msg00142.html),
but at that time it was dropped because it was deemed not supported well
enough across compilers.
Now apparently commit v1.11.3-rc1-2203-geee21a6 added
proto_tree_add_fl
On 1 October 2015 at 17:25, Peter Wu wrote:
> #include
> #define FOO(fmt, ...) printf(fmt, #__VA_ARGS__, __VA_ARGS__)
> int main() {
> return FOO("%s test %d\n", 1);
> }
>
VS2013 appears to be happy, compiling the file with a .c extension:
c:\temp>cl var.c
Microsoft (R) C/C++
Yes, there is a "warning" with GCC from some month...
../../epan/proto.h:2740:54: warning: anonymous variadic macros were
introduced in C99 [-Wvariadic-macros]
Not problem for me, to allow variadic macro !
Regards,
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Graham Bloice
wrote:
>
> On 1 October 2015 a
On Oct 1, 2015, at 9:53 AM, Alexis La Goutte wrote:
> Yes, there is a "warning" with GCC from some month...
>
> ../../epan/proto.h:2740:54: warning: anonymous variadic macros were
> introduced in C99 [-Wvariadic-macros]
Perhaps we need to turn on the "use C99" flag for some compilers, includi
