[Wireshark-dev] size_t vs int

Hi list I'm playing with afl and clang and I've found some points in the code where afl/clang complains, and I'd like to discuss how to change them with you. A warning message got is ../codecs/sbc/sbc.c:111:16: warning: implicit conversion loses integer precision: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') t

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Improve the loopback wiki page

Hi Yang, 2015-09-01 4:09 GMT+02:00 Yang Luo : > Hi Pascal, > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Pascal Quantin > wrote: > >> >> Le 25 août 2015 3:41 PM, "Yang Luo" a écrit : >> > >> > Hi list, >> > >> > I noticed that "Loopback capture setup" ( >> https://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/Loopbac

[Wireshark-dev] using wmem in wiretap

Howdy, I've begun changing wiretap to enable us to handle pcapng files fully, as described in: https://wiki.wireshark.org/WiretapPcapng One of the tangential issues I've hit is the memory management of the various SHB/IDB/etc. structs/members. The previous model for wiretap was somewhat mixed: wir

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Improve the loopback wiki page

Hi Pascal, Thanks for the work and it looks great! This page ranks the first for Windows loopback capturing, so I have confidence that it can help more people find what they need after this update. And I have found that Nmap has registered the www.npcap.org domain, so it should be Npcap's official

Re: [Wireshark-dev] size_t vs int

On Sep 4, 2015, at 6:46 AM, Dario Lombardo wrote: > The first possibility is to change the "lowest" function, to keep the current > prototype but with some integer checks and casts. > > The second possibility is to "sanitize" the lowest function (in the example > above, AFAIK, there is no rea

Re: [Wireshark-dev] using wmem in wiretap

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote: > Howdy, > I've begun changing wiretap to enable us to handle pcapng files fully, > as described in: > https://wiki.wireshark.org/WiretapPcapng > > One of the tangential issues I've hit is the memory management of the > various SHB/IDB/etc. st

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Trying to submit a patch

>Message: 3 >Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 09:45:14 -0400 >From: Hadriel Kaplan >To: Developer support list for Wireshark >Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Trying to submit a patch >Message-ID: > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >I just tried pushing with https, and it works. But of course