[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on OSX-10.5-x86

2008-07-08 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of OSX-10.5-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/OSX-10.5-x86/builds/339 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: osx-10.5-x86 Build Reason: Buil

[Wireshark-dev] buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Windows-XP-x86

2008-07-08 Thread buildbot-no-reply
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Windows-XP-x86 on Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Windows-XP-x86/builds/4538 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: windows-xp-x86 Build Reason

[Wireshark-dev] serializing dissection tree to a file

2008-07-08 Thread MARK LANDRISCINA
Hi all: I need the ability to serialize/deserialize the dissection tree (epan_dissect_t) filled in by epan_dissect_run. Is this functionality already available, or is this something that I will have to write myself? Regards, Mark ___ Wireshark-dev m

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH]: enhanced "what's past last mpls label?" heuristic

2008-07-08 Thread Francesco Fondelli
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Please read http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html/#ChSrcSend about > submitting patches for Wireshark. Just to make sure it doesn't get lost. > > Thanx, > Jaap Hi Jaap, did I forget something in bug report #2689 ?

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector submitted

2008-07-08 Thread Abhik Sarkar
Hi Martin, I see Jaap has posted some comments about the dissector "patch". After you have fixed that, if you are sure that you will change the code in the very near future, you can just put a note in the bug saying that the current patch should not be committed as you are working on a reworked o

[Wireshark-dev] plugin

2008-07-08 Thread Martin Corraine (mcorrain)
Hello, Does anyone know if there is some way for you to drop a dissector plugin into wireshark/plugins/1.0.X and have it work? I do have the installer working but that's not what I would like to do if I don't have too. Thanks, Martin ___ Wireshark-dev

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Dissector submitted

2008-07-08 Thread Stephen Fisher
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:20:41PM -0400, Martin Corraine (mcorrain) wrote: > Is there an easy way I can quickly modify the sources I submitted > without going through reporting a bug since I'm the only original > author of the dissector? No, only the core development team has write access to t

[Wireshark-dev] INET6_ADDRSTRLEN redefinition

2008-07-08 Thread Yunfan (Andy) Ying
Anyone else run into this issue while compiling Wireshark 1.0.1 on Windows XP with VS2005? The INET6_ADDRSTRLEN defined in packet-ipv6.h seems to conflict with the INET6_ADDRSTRLEN of ws2tcpip.h in the Platform SDK. A simple #ifndef _WIN32 block around that definition seems to fix the issue. --An

Re: [Wireshark-dev] INET6_ADDRSTRLEN redefinition

2008-07-08 Thread Martin Corraine (mcorrain)
It complies fine on WinXP32 with VS2005EE. I've updated my sources this morning. Are you on Win64? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yunfan (Andy) Ying Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 5:10 PM To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Subject: [Wire

Re: [Wireshark-dev] INET6_ADDRSTRLEN redefinition

2008-07-08 Thread Yunfan (Andy) Ying
Nope, I'm running on a 32bit version of Windows XP. The svn sources can build without problems. It's only 1.0.1 that errors out with this INET6_ADDRSTRLEN macro redefinition error. --Andy On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Martin Corraine (mcorrain) < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It complies fine o

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH]: enhanced "what's past last mpls label?" heuristic

2008-07-08 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, If you submitted this in the bug database there is no need to post it here as well. That's all. Thanx, Jaap Francesco Fondelli wrote: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Please read http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html/#ChSrcSend about >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] plugin

2008-07-08 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, Yes you can, be be sure that: 1. be sure it's build for the intended release of Wireshark. The API/ABI isn't guaranteed stable between releases. 2. Be sure to drop it in the right release folder. Same reason as 1. Thanx, Jaap Martin Corraine (mcorrain) wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone know

[Wireshark-dev] nlpid.h error?

2008-07-08 Thread Peter Fuller
nlpid.h #defines Q2119 as 0x0c. However, the X.263 table I checked from the ITU's web site says this value is 0x0a. There are comments that indicate the same values can have a slightly different meaning depending on context, and I'm not intimately familiar with this standard so I hesita

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] add field support to MySQL dissector

2008-07-08 Thread Jess Balint
Added missing cast. Updated patch attached. Jess On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:08:09AM +0200, Anders Broman wrote: > Hi, > I get the following: > register.c > packet-mysql.c > packet-mysql.c(2096) : error C2220: warning treated as error - no object > file ge > nerated > packet-mysql.c(2096) : warnin

Re: [Wireshark-dev] [PATCH] add field support to MySQL dissector

2008-07-08 Thread Jaap Keuter
Hi, To reiterate: Please file a bugreport, see http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html/#ChSrcSend Thanx, Jaap Jess Balint wrote: > Added missing cast. Updated patch attached. > > Jess > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 07:08:09AM +0200, Anders Broman wrote: >> Hi, >> I get the following: >> register.