Before replying to some of the points, I want to clarify something:
This is about problems I have encountered in a current setup (no "old"
libs package, current source, clean out of tree setup and build).
Also, when I mentioned setup-macosx.sh I didn't take into account that
some people who are not
On 5 December 2013 19:59, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 12/4/13 12:27 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > as Graham and I are working on getting the Windows build process to
> > a) work at all and b) be on par with the current nmake build process
> > we currently rely on the setup infrastructure
>> > Sent: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 3:33 pm
>> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build setup - Concept required
>> >
>> > Personally I find the GTK2 GUI much more polished than GTK3 on Windows
>> (maybe just a matter of taste...).
>> >
>> >
>>
2013/12/5 Christopher Maynard
> writes:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pascal Quantin
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
>
> > Sent: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 3:33 pm
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build set
writes:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pascal Quantin
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Sent: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 3:33 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build setup - Concept required
>
> Personally I find the GTK2 GUI much more po
+1
-Original Message-
From: Pascal Quantin
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 3:33 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build setup - Concept required
Personally I find the GTK2 GUI much more polished than GTK3 on Windows (maybe
just a matter of
2013/12/5 Gerald Combs
> > 10) The setup process does not allow for the simultanous installation
> >of gtk2 and gtk3
>
> Does GTK3 work well enough on Windows to drop GTK2? This would simplify
> things quite a bit.
>
Personally I find the GTK2 GUI much more polished than GTK3 on Windows
(may
On 12/5/2013 3:02 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
I like Gerald's answers much better than mine :)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://w
Re: creating/using a standard package directory structure on Windows
It sounds like you're suggesting that we take the
packages as distribited and move things
around to a standard structure. This sounds to me like the
effort to do this it might be crazy-making ...
Also: A fe
On 12/4/13 12:27 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as Graham and I are working on getting the Windows build process to
> a) work at all and b) be on par with the current nmake build process
> we currently rely on the setup infrastructure of the nmake build. I
> really don't like porting the "nma
10 matches
Mail list logo
