Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-19 Thread Evan Huus
On 2013-09-19, at 3:41 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > On 09/18/13 17:38, Guy Harris wrote: >> >> On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Gilbert Ramirez wrote: >> >>> I admit to authoring pkt-from-core.py, but I doubt it actually still works. >>> Nevertheless, I have updated the license in the file. >>> >>

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing - log history of renamed files

2013-09-19 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 09/19/13 16:09, Evan Huus wrote: On 2013-09-19, at 3:41 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: On 09/18/13 17:38, Guy Harris wrote: On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Gilbert Ramirez wrote: I admit to authoring pkt-from-core.py, but I doubt it actually still works. Nevertheless, I have updated the licens

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-19 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 09/18/13 17:38, Guy Harris wrote: On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Gilbert Ramirez wrote: I admit to authoring pkt-from-core.py, but I doubt it actually still works. Nevertheless, I have updated the license in the file. I don't remember the others, though. [...] doc/dfilter2pod.pl Gilber

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-19 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:34:26PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Sep 13, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Evan Huus wrote: > > > We have the following tools in our source tree without appropriate > > license headers, > > There's also tools/make-dissector-reg.py, which was written by Gilbert > Ramirez: >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-18 Thread Anders Broman
Guy Harris skrev 2013-09-18 23:28: On Sep 14, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Anders Broman wrote: Jeff Morriss skrev 2013-09-13 23:12: tools/make-tap-reg.py Anders Broman I don't remember writing this http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?revision=27489&view=revision The log message was

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-18 Thread Guy Harris
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Gilbert Ramirez wrote: > I admit to authoring pkt-from-core.py, but I doubt it actually still works. > Nevertheless, I have updated the license in the file. > > I don't remember the others, though. ... > tools/ftsanity.py > > Gilbert Ramirez --

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-18 Thread Guy Harris
On Sep 13, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Evan Huus wrote: > We have the following tools in our source tree without appropriate > license headers, There's also tools/make-dissector-reg.py, which was written by Gilbert Ramirez: r2873 | gram | 2001-01-10 23:21:35 -0800 (Wed, 10 Jan 2001) | 8 lines

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-18 Thread Guy Harris
On Sep 14, 2013, at 2:27 AM, Anders Broman wrote: > Jeff Morriss skrev 2013-09-13 23:12: >> tools/make-tap-reg.py >> >> Anders Broman >> > I don't remember writing this http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?revision=27489&view=revision The log message was Replace the clists wi

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-18 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 09/18/13 01:12, Gilbert Ramirez wrote: I admit to authoring pkt-from-core.py, but I doubt it actually still works. Nevertheless, I have updated the license in the file. I don't remember the others, though. Can you check the svn logs? It would appear to me (from those logs) that you author

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-17 Thread Gilbert Ramirez
I admit to authoring pkt-from-core.py, but I doubt it actually still works. Nevertheless, I have updated the license in the file. I don't remember the others, though. Gilbert On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > Here's a list of who I can figure out to be the authors (based o

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-14 Thread Anders Broman
Jeff Morriss skrev 2013-09-13 23:12: tools/make-tap-reg.py Anders Broman I don't remember writing this if I did it's a copy of the make-register script, I have no problem with having GPL2 copyright notice added. Regards Anders __

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-13 Thread Michael Tuexen
On Sep 14, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Joerg Mayer wrote: > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:07:29AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.devel/22203 >> which gives pretty much the history of this script. It was (more than) >> inspired by >> https://nplab.fh-muenster.de/

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-13 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 01:07:29AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote: > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.network.wireshark.devel/22203 > which gives pretty much the history of this script. It was (more than) > inspired by > https://nplab.fh-muenster.de/groups/wiki/wiki/fb7a4/Building_Wireshark_on_SnowLeopard

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-13 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:32:49PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: > On 09/13/13 18:10, Joerg Mayer wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:12:44PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: > >>>macosx-setup.sh > >> > >>Joerg Mayer > > > >Really? I don't remember. I only remember "improving" it. Maybe Guy or > >Michael r

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-13 Thread Jeff Morriss
On 09/13/13 18:10, Joerg Mayer wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:12:44PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: macosx-setup.sh Joerg Mayer Really? I don't remember. I only remember "improving" it. Maybe Guy or Michael remember something about this script. That's what Guy's checkin comment said: r38

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-13 Thread Joerg Mayer
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 05:12:44PM -0400, Jeff Morriss wrote: > >macosx-setup.sh > > Joerg Mayer Really? I don't remember. I only remember "improving" it. Maybe Guy or Michael remember something about this script. Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer We are s

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Tool Ownership and Licensing

2013-09-13 Thread Jeff Morriss
Here's a list of who I can figure out to be the authors (based on "svn log | tail"). I'm guessing that at least some of these folks probably need to be contacted directly... On 09/13/13 14:45, Evan Huus wrote: We have the following tools in our source tree without appropriate license headers,