Hi,
2011/8/26 Chris Maynard
> Pascal Quantin writes:
>
> > Hi all,since the commit for bug 1723 (done in revision 38679), I'm facing
> issues with text2pcap for really small packet dumps.
> >
> > I guess this is unexpected behavior and should be considered as a bug. Do
> you
> agree ?
>
> I do
Pascal Quantin writes:
> Hi all,since the commit for bug 1723 (done in revision 38679), I'm facing
issues with text2pcap for really small packet dumps.
>
> I guess this is unexpected behavior and should be considered as a bug. Do you
agree ?
I do and have reopened bug 1723 as a result. Hopeful
Pascal Quantin wrote:
I started looking at the code change done by Chris Maynard and it fails
with my sample because it tries to compare the not present ASCII string
with the HEX string (so as to avoid taking a beginning of the ASCII
string as part of the HEX string, as explained in bug 1723)
Hi
2011/8/25 Pascal Quantin
> Hi all,
>
> since the commit for bug 1723 (done in revision 38679), I'm facing issues
> with text2pcap for really small packet dumps.
>
> Let's take this simple file example:
> 30 00 20
>
> By executing the following command line:
> text2pcap.exe -q -l 162 temp
Hi all,
since the commit for bug 1723 (done in revision 38679), I'm facing issues
with text2pcap for really small packet dumps.
Let's take this simple file example:
30 00 20
By executing the following command line:
text2pcap.exe -q -l 162 temp.txt temp.pcap
I get the following binary pcap
