On Sep 4, 2015, at 6:46 AM, Dario Lombardo wrote:
> The first possibility is to change the "lowest" function, to keep the current
> prototype but with some integer checks and casts.
>
> The second possibility is to "sanitize" the lowest function (in the example
> above, AFAIK, there is no rea
Hi list
I'm playing with afl and clang and I've found some points in the code where
afl/clang complains, and I'd like to discuss how to change them with you.
A warning message got is
../codecs/sbc/sbc.c:111:16: warning: implicit conversion loses integer
precision: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') t
