In order for you not to start from scratch, I send you the dissector I tried to
write, even if it does not work and is sub-optimal.
Nicola
Scrive Sebastien Tandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> I will try to do it this WE.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sebastien Tandel
>
> Nicola Arnoldi wrote:
> > Hi all
Hi,
I will try to do it this WE.
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
Nicola Arnoldi wrote:
> Hi all.
> I noticed that the version 1 of the roofnet header has got additional
> fields, as one might understand from the srpacket.hh file i posted
> some email ago.
>
> In particular, there are 6 and a half mo
Hi all.
I noticed that the version 1 of the roofnet header has got additional
fields, as one might understand from the srpacket.hh file i posted
some email ago.
In particular, there are 6 and a half more lines in the header than
in version 2.
Can you modify the dissector in order to make
Was the pcap file enough?
Bye
Nicola
Il giorno mar, 09/01/2007 alle 12.34 +0100, Sebastien Tandel ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
>Can you send a pcap file for testing purpose, please?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sebastien Tandel
>
> Nicola Arnoldi wrote:
> > Hi everybody.
> > The great work Sebastien did a
Hi,
Can you send a pcap file for testing purpose, please?
Regards,
Sebastien Tandel
Nicola Arnoldi wrote:
> Hi everybody.
> The great work Sebastien did about Roofnet dissectors was related to
> Version 2, which is still far from stable.
> It should be implemented the V 1 as well, which has
Hi everybody.
The great work Sebastien did about Roofnet dissectors was related to
Version 2, which is still far from stable.
It should be implemented the V 1 as well, which has some differences
between V2.
I attach the c++ header, hoping it would be sufficient for you to modify
the dissector accor
