On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Michael Mann wrote:
> Also wanted to mention that I think Stig volunteered to add support on the
> Lua end (another area that I'm not familiar enough with to add support).
>
Yes, I will have a look at the Lua support.
--
Stig Bjørlykke
you removed the "manual" function, if that's
where the asn2wrs engine would come in.
-Original Message-
From: Pascal Quantin
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2016 10:18 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings)
Hi Michael,
f file ;)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pascal Quantin
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Sent: Fri, Dec 16, 2016 10:18 am
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings)
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> 2016-12-16 16:14 GMT+01:00 Michael Mann
rrect me, but I thought I'd put that out there to prevent
> duplication of work (in case others thought it was needed).
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Michael Mann
> To: wireshark-dev
> Sent: Mon, Dec 12, 2016 8:26 am
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h exte
of work
(in case others thought it was needed).
-Original Message-
From: Michael Mann
To: wireshark-dev
Sent: Mon, Dec 12, 2016 8:26 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings)
I'm not sure where the line between screaming "FEATURE CREAP!" an
>Message: 1
>Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 22:17:11 -0500
>From: Michael Mann
>To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
>Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings)
>Message-ID: <158f108bd63-2eb5-5...@webstg-m08.mail.aol.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="
f a float/double? And in some
(most?) cases they are probably justified.
-Original Message-----
From: Michal Labedzki
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Mon, Dec 12, 2016 3:47 am
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension (unit strings)
Good idea.
I have similar problem with
On Dec 11, 2016, at 11:18 PM, Michal Labedzki wrote:
> Good idea.
> I have similar problem with Bluetooth protocols. There is a lot of something
> like that:
> "Latency = N * 0.625 ms (1 Baseband slot)"
I.e., the value of the field is the number of baseband slots, and the latency,
in millisec
Good idea.
I have similar problem with Bluetooth protocols. There is a lot of
something like that:
"Latency = N * 0.625 ms (1 Baseband slot)"
So I want to display [ms] instead of [slot] (or maybe both? [new use
case]). What should I do in that case (N * 0.625)?
1. use own BASE_CUSTOM (dissector fi
I thought this was a good idea, just took a while to get around to it:
https://code.wireshark.org/review/19211
-Original Message-
From: Guy Harris
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Fri, May 8, 2015 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] proto.h extension
On May 8, 2015, a
10 matches
Mail list logo
