On Sat, Aug 25, 2007 at 04:57:36PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> If you like, I think we can add a clarification to the pidl output files
> stating that we do not consider them derived works of pidl.
Thanks, that would be perfect. I've just added a statement to this
extent to the COPYING file o
Hi Joerg,
Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I don't see
> any problem in including a GPLv3 tool (pidl) into the Wireshark repository
> I have a question regarding the license of the generated dissectors. So
> far the generated dissectors don't contain
BTW to get back to our actual problem, I think that for both Yapp add
PIDL the licensing issue is non-relevant. As We distribute them as
tools for building the program, I believe it to be mere agregation.
A very different issue is the stub code generated by PIDL itself that
goes to the dissectors,
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:43:58PM +0100, Richard van der Hoff wrote:
>> Joerg Mayer wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:05:44AM +0200, Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
YAPP's Driver is either GPL or Artistic .
http://search.cpan.org/~fdesar/Parse-Y
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 01:43:58PM +0100, Richard van der Hoff wrote:
> Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:05:44AM +0200, Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> >> YAPP's Driver is either GPL or Artistic .
> >>
> >> http://search.cpan.org/~fdesar/Parse-Yapp-1.05/lib/Parse/Yapp.pm#COPYRIGHT
: You
That's part of the pod part of Yapp.pm has the only mention of a
license that there is in the entire Yapp distribution.
BTW there's no LICENSE or COPYRIGHT file.
the Copiright notice present on every file says (c) 1998-2001 Francois
Desarmenien, all rights reserved.
On 8/13/07, Richard van de
Joerg Mayer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:05:44AM +0200, Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
>> YAPP's Driver is either GPL or Artistic .
>>
>> http://search.cpan.org/~fdesar/Parse-Yapp-1.05/lib/Parse/Yapp.pm#COPYRIGHT
>
> Sure, but GPLv2 only if I see this correctly?
It doesn't specify this, does it? T
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:05:44AM +0200, Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
> YAPP's Driver is either GPL or Artistic .
>
> http://search.cpan.org/~fdesar/Parse-Yapp-1.05/lib/Parse/Yapp.pm#COPYRIGHT
Sure, but GPLv2 only if I see this correctly?
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer
On 8/12/07, Ulf Lamping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Mayer schrieb:
> Another thing would be to use code/data from GPLv3 samba, which is a
> problem as GPLv2 and v3 is *not* compatible. In addition: If the samba
> tools would start to include GPLv3 headers into the generated files, we
> must
Joerg Mayer schrieb:
> Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I don't see
> any problem in including a GPLv3 tool (pidl) into the Wireshark repository
> I have a question regarding the license of the generated dissectors. So
> far the generated dissectors don't contain a license
YAPP's Driver is either GPL or Artistic .
http://search.cpan.org/~fdesar/Parse-Yapp-1.05/lib/Parse/Yapp.pm#COPYRIGHT
On 8/12/07, Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:30:51AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:30:51AM +0200, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I don't see
> any problem in including a GPLv3 tool (pidl) into the Wireshark repository
> I have a question regarding the license of the generated dissectors. So
> far the gene
Samba's svn has made the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. While I don't see
any problem in including a GPLv3 tool (pidl) into the Wireshark repository
I have a question regarding the license of the generated dissectors. So
far the generated dissectors don't contain a license statement (nor a
copyright s
13 matches
Mail list logo
