Re: [Wireshark-dev] asn2wrs again

Hi Eliot, Le 30 déc. 2016 08:55, "Eliot Lear" a écrit : Thanks for your comment. I got it working. I'll make a pull request in a few days' time. Great. Just to be sure, keep in mind that we are not using Github.com pull request system, but instead are using Gerrit code review system. See htt

Re: [Wireshark-dev] asn2wrs again

Thanks for your comment. I got it working. I'll make a pull request in a few days' time. Eliot On 12/29/16 5:54 PM, Pascal Quantin wrote: > Hi Eliot, > > 2016-12-24 12:52 GMT+01:00 Eliot Lear >: > > Sorry to whine about this, but I'm struggling with the d

Re: [Wireshark-dev] asn2wrs again

Hi Eliot, 2016-12-24 12:52 GMT+01:00 Eliot Lear : > Sorry to whine about this, but I'm struggling with the documentation a > bit. I'm trying to understand what is necessary to cause wireshark to > interpret a new OID in a certificate (a certificate extension- it's just > an IA5String). Simply i

[Wireshark-dev] asn2wrs again

Sorry to whine about this, but I'm struggling with the documentation a bit. I'm trying to understand what is necessary to cause wireshark to interpret a new OID in a certificate (a certificate extension- it's just an IA5String). Simply including the MIB doesn't appear to be enough (it's a very si