Thanks Luis. That probably shouldn't be like that.
-martin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis EG
Ontanon
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:10 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark ve
I made sure it wasn't a typo.
>
> -martin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luis EG
> Ontanon
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:03 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:03 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Wireshark version
I saw a report on this ML of someone downloading the 1.0.0 installer
from the 1.0.1 link...
is this another case?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Jeff Morriss &l
I saw a report on this ML of someone downloading the 1.0.0 installer
from the 1.0.1 link...
is this another case?
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Jeff Morriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Martin Corraine (mcorrain) wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there a reason the new version of the win32 Wiresha
Martin Corraine (mcorrain) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a reason the new version of the win32 Wireshark says 1.0.0
> instead of 1.0.1?
Where does it say that? In Help->About my Windows Wireshark says:
Version 1.0.1 (SVN Rev 25639)
___
Wireshark-de
Le Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:36:22 +0200,
"Martin Corraine (mcorrain)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Is there a reason the new version of the win32 Wireshark says 1.0.0
> instead of 1.0.1?
>
> -martin
>
>
In the release notes, we can see:
New and Updated Features
The following fea
Hello,
Is there a reason the new version of the win32 Wireshark says 1.0.0
instead of 1.0.1?
-martin
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
Hi,
Tried to create binary rpm package(using make rpm-package) for 0.99.6
release and got the following error.
Wireshark builds successfully on the above mentioned version of Fedora
Linux (configure, make and make install) and captures the messages.
Is there a fix to create a rpm successfully.?
#
