Before replying to some of the points, I want to clarify something:
This is about problems I have encountered in a current setup (no "old"
libs package, current source, clean out of tree setup and build).
Also, when I mentioned setup-macosx.sh I didn't take into account that
some people who are not
On 5 December 2013 19:59, Gerald Combs wrote:
> On 12/4/13 12:27 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > as Graham and I are working on getting the Windows build process to
> > a) work at all and b) be on par with the current nmake build process
> > we currently rely on the setup infrastructure
>> > Sent: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 3:33 pm
>> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build setup - Concept required
>> >
>> > Personally I find the GTK2 GUI much more polished than GTK3 on Windows
>> (maybe just a matter of taste...).
>> >
>> >
>>
2013/12/5 Christopher Maynard
> writes:
>
> > +1
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pascal Quantin
> > To: Developer support list for Wireshark
>
> > Sent: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 3:33 pm
> > Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build set
writes:
> +1
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pascal Quantin
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Sent: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 3:33 pm
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build setup - Concept required
>
> Personally I find the GTK2 GUI much more po
+1
-Original Message-
From: Pascal Quantin
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 3:33 pm
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Windows build setup - Concept required
Personally I find the GTK2 GUI much more polished than GTK3 on Windows (maybe
just a matter of
2013/12/5 Gerald Combs
> > 10) The setup process does not allow for the simultanous installation
> >of gtk2 and gtk3
>
> Does GTK3 work well enough on Windows to drop GTK2? This would simplify
> things quite a bit.
>
Personally I find the GTK2 GUI much more polished than GTK3 on Windows
(may
On 12/5/2013 3:02 PM, Bill Meier wrote:
I like Gerald's answers much better than mine :)
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing list
Archives:http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://w
Re: creating/using a standard package directory structure on Windows
It sounds like you're suggesting that we take the
packages as distribited and move things
around to a standard structure. This sounds to me like the
effort to do this it might be crazy-making ...
Also: A fe
On 12/4/13 12:27 PM, Joerg Mayer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as Graham and I are working on getting the Windows build process to
> a) work at all and b) be on par with the current nmake build process
> we currently rely on the setup infrastructure of the nmake build. I
> really don't like porting the "nma
Hello,
as Graham and I are working on getting the Windows build process to
a) work at all and b) be on par with the current nmake build process
we currently rely on the setup infrastructure of the nmake build. I
really don't like porting the "nmake -f Makefile.nmake setup" to cmake.
Not because it
11 matches
Mail list logo
