LOL I was too stupid to figure that out ;) I selected +
C
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 9:15 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] UNISTIM plugin tap
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:09:35PM -0400, Singer, Chad wrote:
> Apparently I don't have sufficient rights on bugs.wireshark.org to set
> 'review_for_checkin'..
You can't set it to "?" (+ is for accepted, - is for rejected)? I just
set them all for you.
Steve
__
y, September 04, 2007 7:29 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] UNISTIM plugin tap interface + call grapher
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 07:07:05PM -0400, Singer, Chad wrote:
> I whipped up a tap interface for the UNISTIM plugin and also
> implemented a basic call
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 07:07:05PM -0400, Singer, Chad wrote:
> I whipped up a tap interface for the UNISTIM plugin and also
> implemented a basic call control graph in voip-calls.c Who do I need
> to run this code by to make sure its kosher before it gets added to
> the tree?
Please open a bug a
I whipped up a tap interface for the UNISTIM plugin and also implemented
a basic call control graph in voip-calls.c Who do I need to run this
code by to make sure its kosher before it gets added to the tree?
Chad Singer
Support Engineer
Cypress Communications
404-442-0216
___
Hi,
Please have a look at the current h223 plugin source tree to see how the
various Makefile and other support files are setup to make sure all meta
data and source distribution is in order.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Newton, Don wrote:
> It has been tested on both Linux and Windows XP.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 06:45:25PM -0400, Newton, Don wrote:
> It has been tested on both Linux and Windows XP.
Please perform some fuzz testing. This is likely to crash the code:
None(?) of the value_strings are properly terminated {0, NULL}
Also, please add the standard header to all the sour
On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:26:18PM -0400, Newton, Don wrote:
> I recently downloaded the pdf from Nortel that describes UNISTIN
> pretty thoroughly and I am probably 30% done fleshing out a plugin
> dissector (it's a very chatting protocol). I would like to contribute
> but don't want to open
I recently downloaded the pdf from Nortel that describes UNISTIN pretty
thoroughly and I am probably 30% done fleshing out a plugin dissector
(it's a very chatting protocol). I would like to contribute but don't
want to open a legal can of worms. The protocol description was easy to
find on the N
