On 6. aug.. 2008, at 23.03, Brooss wrote:
> Still looking for feedback on getting bug 2373
> (https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2373) checked in.
> No rush but some more advice on whats required to get this checked in
> would be appreciated.
Just available time to review it :)
Hi,
Still looking for feedback on getting bug 2373
(https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2373) checked in.
No rush but some more advice on whats required to get this checked in
would be appreciated.
Thank you.
___
Wireshark-dev mailing
Just a friendly reminder that I have addressed the comments you made on
the bug (2373) with a new patch and am waiting for more feedback.
Thank you
Brooss
Jaap Keuter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You caught us in a busy time, working towards 1.0.0. I've looked at it and
> added some comments. Lets keep wor
Hi,
You caught us in a busy time, working towards 1.0.0. I've looked at it and
added some comments. Lets keep working on it in bugzilla.
Thanx,
Jaap
Brooss wrote:
> Hi wireshark-dev,
>
> A few months ago I completed work on a TeamSpeak2 dissector and posted
> it on the bug tracker (2373).
>
Hi wireshark-dev,
A few months ago I completed work on a TeamSpeak2 dissector and posted
it on the bug tracker (2373).
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2373
No one seems to have had a chance to review it yet but I would
appreciate some feedback on the chances of it getting ch
