On Jan 25, 2012, at 4:34 AM, Guy Harris wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
>
>> I have had a quick look at QtShark loading a 150 Mb file is sligtly faster
>> than the GTK version(~6s vs 8s
>
> Note that the Qt version doesn't yet show a progress bar. I'm experiment
-Original Message-
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Guy Harris
Sent: den 25 januari 2012 13:35
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] QtShark performance
On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:57 AM
On Jan 25, 2012, at 12:57 AM, Anders Broman wrote:
> I have had a quick look at QtShark loading a 150 Mb file is sligtly faster
> than the GTK version(~6s vs 8s
Note that the Qt version doesn't yet show a progress bar. I'm experimenting
with a different API for the progress bar, where you alw
Hi,
I have had a quick look at QtShark loading a 150 Mb file is sligtly faster than
the GTK version(~6s vs 8s but filtering takes about 3 times as long(~30s vs
~13s).
I think fixing/improving that should be a priority as that's a showstopper.
Best regards
Anders
