support list for Wireshark
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Preparing to Write Dissector for New IPv6
Destination Option
You probably need a more recent version of Wireshark. That looks like a bug
that was fixed last year.
You should be running Wireshark 1.12
__
> From: Hadriel Kaplan
> To: Nalini Elkins
> Cc: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 10:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Preparing to Write Dissector for New IPv6
> Destination Option
>
>
> Try the attached.
>
nside Products, Inc.
(831) 659-8360
www.insidethestack.com
From: Hadriel Kaplan
To: Nalini Elkins
Cc: Developer support list for Wireshark
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2015 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Preparing to Write Dissector for New IPv6
Destination Optio
Try the attached.
There is one caveat: it won’t work correctly if you have a IPv6 Destination
Options Header with the PDM option but also other option types in that same
header.
Also, I have no idea if I did the time scaling correctly.
BTW, there’s a bug in the draft: page 8 says for the Optio
: [Wireshark-dev] Preparing to Write Dissector for New IPv6
Destination Option
If you can wait an hour, I’ll find some free time to look at your script in
detail and see if I can send you an updated/corrected one.
Some quick comments from skimming the script:
The first error you’re seeing is because on
If you can wait an hour, I’ll find some free time to look at your script in
detail and see if I can send you an updated/corrected one.
Some quick comments from skimming the script:
The first error you’re seeing is because on line 34 (and lines after) you’re
invoking the subtreeitem:add() with t
Hello All,
Please let me know if I should post this to the user's list.
My proposal for a new IPv6 Destination Option was recently adopted by the IP
Performance Metrics Working Group of the IETF. It is at:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-6man-pdm-option/
I have started impl
