On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Pascal Quantin
wrote:
> Le 24/03/2013 00:57, Evan Huus a écrit :
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>>> On 03/23/2013 10:07 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
Am I correct in thinking that in packet-gsm_a_dtap.c around line 6432,
if match_strval_id
Le 24/03/2013 00:57, Evan Huus a écrit :
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
>> On 03/23/2013 10:07 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>>> Am I correct in thinking that in packet-gsm_a_dtap.c around line 6432,
>>> if match_strval_idx doesn't find a match then we will access invalid
>>> memory
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Jaap Keuter wrote:
> On 03/23/2013 10:07 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
>> Am I correct in thinking that in packet-gsm_a_dtap.c around line 6432,
>> if match_strval_idx doesn't find a match then we will access invalid
>> memory because idx will be used as an array index with
On 03/23/2013 10:07 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> Am I correct in thinking that in packet-gsm_a_dtap.c around line 6432,
> if match_strval_idx doesn't find a match then we will access invalid
> memory because idx will be used as an array index with value -1?
>
> Evan
Unless gsm_a_dtap_msg_cc_strings con
Am I correct in thinking that in packet-gsm_a_dtap.c around line 6432,
if match_strval_idx doesn't find a match then we will access invalid
memory because idx will be used as an array index with value -1?
Evan
___
Sent via:
