Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-13 Thread Ulf Lamping
Graeme, first of all, thanks again for bringing the PortableApps thing to life, I think this was a good thing which now needs some more polishing and shows up some already existing problems even more clearly - so please don't take my words too seriously. The discussion here only indicates a p

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-13 Thread Graeme Lunt
Ulf, > What I'm more concerned about the current U3 and PortableApps > generation is: maintainability! > > I've seen the WinPcap version at least 5 times! I am confused. Based on your own checked in changes: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.py?view=rev&revision=23431 and http://anonsv

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-12 Thread Ulf Lamping
Maynard, Chris schrieb: > UPX indicates "very fast decompression", but there's bound to be some time > penalty vs. not compressing the executable. Nevertheless, it seems worth > doing to me as well - at least trying it out to compare the difference in > installation time, space, etc. And if th

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-11 Thread Maynard, Chris
eshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback Graeme Lunt schrieb: > An hour - wow. Maybe I should add something to the installation wizard > to indicate that it could take quite a while! PortableApps recommend > compressing exes/dlls with UPX (http://upx.sourceforg

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-11 Thread Ulf Lamping
Graeme Lunt schrieb: > An hour - wow. Maybe I should add something to the installation wizard > to indicate that it could take quite a while! PortableApps recommend > compressing exes/dlls with UPX (http://upx.sourceforge.net/) - but I > haven't looked at how much of a difference this makes yet. >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-11 Thread Graeme Lunt
Chris, On 09/11/2007, Maynard, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI: I was finally able to build & test a PortableApps version of Wireshark. > The SVN version I used was 23398. Initially when I built it and tried to run > it off a USB flash drive, it failed due to some "unspecified error".

Re: [Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-09 Thread Guy Harris
Maynard, Chris wrote: > Oh, one last thing - I read an article, linked from the > www.portableapps.com website that indicated that you could run a > PortableApps application on Linux if you have wine installed. I did not > try that ... yet. Unfortunately, I probably won't be able to try it > until

[Wireshark-dev] PortableApps Wireshark feedback

2007-11-08 Thread Maynard, Chris
FYI: I was finally able to build & test a PortableApps version of Wireshark. The SVN version I used was 23398. Initially when I built it and tried to run it off a USB flash drive, it failed due to some "unspecified error". I had tried to save some time by not running a distclean first, but in