Stig Bjørlykke schrieb:
> Den 26. aug. 2007 kl. 18.09 skrev Stephen Fisher:
>
>
>> Don't forget to add this to the user's guide :)
>>
>
> It's not much information about the styles in the user's guide, but I
> have updated the existing info.
>
> It seems like all screen captures in the us
Den 26. aug. 2007 kl. 16.26 skrev Abhik Sarkar:
> PS: A couple of more styles wouldn't hurt, would they? Perhaps a
> triangle and a square. :-)
I don't think we really need different type of dots. It's difficult
to spot the difference with 1 and 2 pixels per tick, and even with
the other res
Den 26. aug. 2007 kl. 18.09 skrev Stephen Fisher:
> Don't forget to add this to the user's guide :)
It's not much information about the styles in the user's guide, but I
have updated the existing info.
It seems like all screen captures in the user's guide is taken on a
MS windows system, exc
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 04:06:42PM +0200, Stig Bj?rlykke wrote:
> I have added a new style in IO Graph called "Dot" (r22666). This is
> like the top of FBar, and I find this usefull together with Impulse.
Don't forget to add this to the user's guide :)
Steve
__
x Cross, + cross, a dot, a square and a rhombus, can all be over
imposed and still be clearly distinguishable even when drawn at a very
low resolution (5x5).
circle and triangle mesh up and are not easy to identify at low res.
Luis
On 8/26/07, Abhik Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very cool
Very cool. Now that you have added it, I wonder why I didn't put this
on the wishlist before because I have often run into situations where
one graph hides the other and having a different style would solve the
problem. Thanks Stig!
Abhik
PS: A couple of more styles wouldn't hurt, would they? Per
Hi.
I have added a new style in IO Graph called "Dot" (r22666). This is
like the top of FBar, and I find this usefull together with Impulse.
Any comments are welcome :)
--
Stig Bjørlykke
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
