Re: [Wireshark-dev] Motivation for wmem [was: rev 52264]

2013-09-30 Thread Bálint Réczey
Hi All, 2013/9/30 Evan Huus : > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Jakub Zawadzki > wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:35:59PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote: >>> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jakub Zawadzki >>> wrote: >>> > But back to topic (cause you'll probably see this problem few more times). >

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Motivation for wmem [was: rev 52264]

2013-09-29 Thread Evan Huus
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:35:59PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jakub Zawadzki >> wrote: >> > But back to topic (cause you'll probably see this problem few more times). >> > I don't quite get a point why we ne

Re: [Wireshark-dev] Motivation for wmem [was: rev 52264]

2013-09-29 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 05:35:59PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jakub Zawadzki > wrote: > > But back to topic (cause you'll probably see this problem few more times). > > I don't quite get a point why we need to change everything to wmem. > > (To be honest I still don

[Wireshark-dev] Motivation for wmem [was: rev 52264]

2013-09-29 Thread Evan Huus
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > But back to topic (cause you'll probably see this problem few more times). > I don't quite get a point why we need to change everything to wmem. > (To be honest I still don't quite get why we need wmem_ at all, but let's > skip that). Wmem