Ulf Lamping wrote:
> So expect some build Win32 problems in the next weeks ... ;-)
Thanks Ulf. :)
I've been strugling to compilie WS on my windows but nothing works since
I don't have VS6 which is virtually impossible to obtain.
Luckly, I still have a Linux machine so I'm still able to play with t
Joerg Mayer wrote:
> As an alternative: I hope to find some time after Christmas to "sort of
> complete" the cmake stuff (for Unixish OSes). How about trying to expand
> this to work with Win as well? cmake has a few windows backends.
>
>
Well, instead of using a currently experimental cmake sup
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:23:46AM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
> We currently only "support" MSVC Version 6 for the Windows builds.
>
> As Version 6 is pretty much outdated and it's possible that I won't have
> access to such an installation in the near future, it seems to become
> time to make WS
Well, I'm excited about it. The debugger for VS8 is *much* more
intelligent. Not to mention, with support for >VS7 it'd be
[possible/easier] to write .net apps that interact with wireshark,
plugins that take advantage of the .net framework, and possibly other
ideas I haven't yet thought of.
Gerald Combs wrote:
> Ulf Lamping wrote:
>
>> Do you mean legal issues, or something else?
>>
>
> I mean having Wireshark linked against a newer CRT DLL and glib linked
> against an older one, for example.
>
Yes, that IS one of the main problems that needs to be solved.
There are others
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Gerald Combs wrote:
>> No complaints here. Are there any issues with the supporting libraries
>> that need to be addressed, e.g. msvcrt.dll vs msvcr7.dll?
>>
> Do you mean legal issues, or something else?
I mean having Wireshark linked against a newer CRT DLL and glib link
Gerald Combs wrote:
> No complaints here. Are there any issues with the supporting libraries
> that need to be addressed, e.g. msvcrt.dll vs msvcr7.dll?
>
Do you mean legal issues, or something else?
Regards, ULFL
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wires
Ulf Lamping wrote:
> Hi List!
>
> We currently only "support" MSVC Version 6 for the Windows builds.
>
> As Version 6 is pretty much outdated and it's possible that I won't have
> access to such an installation in the near future, it seems to become
> time to make WS buildable on a newer MSVC v
Hi List!
We currently only "support" MSVC Version 6 for the Windows builds.
As Version 6 is pretty much outdated and it's possible that I won't have
access to such an installation in the near future, it seems to become
time to make WS buildable on a newer MSVC version.
If available time permit
