Re: [Wireshark-dev] IPv6 longest representation vs INET6_ADDRSTRLEN

2011-05-14 Thread Sake Blok
On 5 mei 2011, at 19:41, Gerald Combs wrote: > On 5/5/11 6:01 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: >> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:01:06PM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: >>> IMHO when IPv4-mapping is used the longest address is: >>> :::255.255.255.255 (22B) >>> >>> Anyone knows inet_ntop(AF_INET6, ..) implem

Re: [Wireshark-dev] IPv6 longest representation vs INET6_ADDRSTRLEN

2011-05-05 Thread Gerald Combs
On 5/5/11 6:01 AM, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:01:06PM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: >> IMHO when IPv4-mapping is used the longest address is: >> :::255.255.255.255 (22B) >> >> Anyone knows inet_ntop(AF_INET6, ..) implementation which can actually use >> 46 bytes? > > M

Re: [Wireshark-dev] IPv6 longest representation vs INET6_ADDRSTRLEN

2011-05-05 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 02:01:06PM +0200, Jakub Zawadzki wrote: > IMHO when IPv4-mapping is used the longest address is: > :::255.255.255.255 (22B) > > Anyone knows inet_ntop(AF_INET6, ..) implementation which can actually use 46 > bytes? Maybe some inet_ntop() implementation don't generate

[Wireshark-dev] IPv6 longest representation vs INET6_ADDRSTRLEN

2011-05-05 Thread Jakub Zawadzki
Hi, epan/ftypes/ftype_bytes.c:ipv6_repr_len() returns 39 which is length of: ":::::::" But it's common to have INET6_ADDRSTRLEN defined to 46, which I believe is length of "::::::255.255.255.255" + 1 byte for NUL. IMHO when IPv4-mapping i