Please do.
> On 19 Jun 2019, at 14:02, Dario Lombardo wrote:
>
> Personally I like I/O as well. I am pleased that search engines can
> understand both IO and I/O, but I like that applications still use I/O in
> labels.
> Then, unless someone objects, I'd go with a patch to use I/O everywhere.
Personally I like I/O as well. I am pleased that search engines can
understand both IO and I/O, but I like that applications still use I/O in
labels.
Then, unless someone objects, I'd go with a patch to use I/O everywhere.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 11:04 PM Guy Harris wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2019, at
On Jun 15, 2019, at 1:55 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> Perhaps the youth of today think of it as "IO"; if not, I'd go with "I/O".
For what it's worth, a Google search for
"io" "linux"
has "io GNU/Linux" as its first hit, but that's the name of a distribution, so
I'm not sure it counts. The
On Jun 15, 2019, at 1:36 PM, Dario Lombardo wrote:
> A user reported a misalignment in the codebase for IO Graphs vs I/O Graphs.
> Indeed there is a mix of the two of them. What should be the correct wording?
I think of it as "I/O", but I'm an old person who remembers hearing about
"input/outp
Hi
A user reported a misalignment in the codebase for IO Graphs vs I/O Graphs.
Indeed there is a mix of the two of them. What should be the correct
wording?
Dario.
--
Naima is online.
___
Sent via:Wireshark-dev mailing l
