I submitted a bugzilla [1].
[1] https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9940
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Nakayama Kenjiro wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> There are some problems to solve... It's my understanding that there are
> following three main points.
>
> 1. Now there is no Lua d
Thanks,
There are some problems to solve... It's my understanding that there are
following three main points.
1. Now there is no Lua dissector yet. And the consensus to include Lua
dissectors is neccessary.
2. If we will include Lua dissectors, there are two (or more) ways to
consider, a)includ
On Mar 26, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Nakayama Kenjiro wrote:
> Recently I wrote new dissector by pure Lua[1] and I am thinking about
> submitting a request to include the dissector to Wireshark.
> But as far as I checked upstream, there are no pure Lua dissector yet.
Right, none yet.
The challenge I
Hi,
Recently I wrote new dissector by pure Lua[1] and I am thinking about
submitting a request to include the dissector to Wireshark.
But as far as I checked upstream, there are no pure Lua dissector yet.
And I don't know where shoudld I put the code in and how to modify
Makefiles.
So my question
