From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Ashish
Sent: den 25 april 2013 16:11
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] GSoC 2013: Process Information
Hi,
By mistake I sent a reply to wireshark-dev without editing the
Hi,
By mistake I sent a reply to wireshark-dev without editing the subject.
Please find my reply below.
> On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
>
> > Polling the system's TCP and UDP connection tables is trivial but its
> > usefulness is limited since it assumes that your interesti
On Apr 24, 2013, at 12:10 PM, Anders Broman wrote:
> Process info is entirely useless when capturing of a mirror/pawn port
...or in monitor mode on Wi-Fi, or in promiscuous mode on a non-switched
Ethernet, or with some type of passive tapping hardware (Endace DAG cards,
etc.)...
> so it shou
On Apr 24, 2013, at 11:20 AM, Gerald Combs wrote:
> Polling the system's TCP and UDP connection tables is trivial but its
> usefulness is limited since it assumes that your interesting traffic has
> a corresponding table entry at the instant you poll. This may not be the
> case for short-lived c
Gerald Combs skrev 2013-04-24 20:20:
On 4/24/13 3:26 AM, Ashish wrote:
Hi all,
This mail is in reply to the mail sent (below) by Kostadin.
I'm contacting you with an intent to request some further info about
the task "Process Information" as found on the Wireshark's Google
Summ
On 4/24/13 3:26 AM, Ashish wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This mail is in reply to the mail sent (below) by Kostadin.
>
>
> I'm contacting you with an intent to request some further info about
> the task "Process Information" as found on the Wireshark's Google
> Summer of Code 2013 project pag
Hi all,
This mail is in reply to the mail sent (below) by Kostadin.
> I'm contacting you with an intent to request some further info about the
> task "Process Information" as found on the Wireshark's Google Summer of
> Code 2013 project page.
>
> After a short research on the matter, I cant help
Ashish Raste writes:
> 1. Could you suggest me some pointers/references
> specifically related to knowing the process info of the packets so that I
can start working/thinking along
> those lines.
For starters, you might want to have a look at this bug report:
https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzill
Hi all,
I'm a CS student from National University of Singapore. I came through the
GSoC project ideas of Wireshark and I'm interested to know/learn about
having Wireshark tell the Process information of the packets captured.
I mainly wanted to ask you the following:
1. Could you suggest me some p
