On 9/25/06, ronnie sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are these zero length constructs actually allowed by the standard?
>
> If they are not it might be better to just abort dissection completely
> with a "[malformed packet]" message.
I honestly do not know if the standard allows for that, howe
s one item of Zero length :)
>
> Which may not be so easy to fix.
> Brg
> Anders
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Oleg Kostenko
> Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 11:09 AM
> To: Anders Broman; wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev
AE> Which may not be so easy to fix.
ABAE> Brg
ABAE> Anders
ABAE> -Original Message-
ABAE> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Oleg Kostenko
ABAE> Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 11:09 AM
ABAE> To: Anders Broman; wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
ABAE> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd:
Hi,
Well there is one item of Zero length :)
Which may not be so easy to fix.
Brg
Anders
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Oleg Kostenko
Sent: Mon 9/25/2006 11:09 AM
To: Anders Broman; wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Fwd: And again BER
