Stratemeier, Frank schrieb:
> Yo Chris!
>
> I had the same problem and was just wondering why.
> It seems that "Expert Info" rescans a capture passing no valid tree
> pointer. "Expert Info Composite" does indeed pass a valid tree pointer!.
> So in my dissector the EIC makes much more sense.
You
n!
Chris
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ulf
Lamping
Sent: Thu 8/16/2007 6:30 PM
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Expert Infos are a bit "more official"
now!
Den 17. aug. 2007 kl. 00.30 skrev Ulf Lamping:
> P.S: Any suggestions about the User Guide and Wiki page text or the EI
> feature itself is welcome ...
What about adding an abbreviated name, like "frame.severity", to be
able to make a filter or an IO Graph based on this information?
--
Stig
30 PM
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Expert Infos are a bit "more official" now!
Hi List!
I think the Expert Info feature that I've added a while ago should be
used more widely :-)
In the last days I've added the "Expert Info" feature to
Hi List!
I think the Expert Info feature that I've added a while ago should be
used more widely :-)
In the last days I've added the "Expert Info" feature to the User's
Guide, so users have a chance to know how to use it.
I've also changed the Wiki's ExpertInfo Developer page, it's more of a
